I think this bill has nothing to do with that.
This bill simply permits out of state notarizations to be accepted as valid on their face. The individual can still dispute the validity of the notarization, either out of state or in-state, if he believes fraud is involved and the paperwork has never actually been seen or examined.
After all, an in-state notarization is as much likely to be fraudulent as an out of state notarization.
Accepting out of state notarizations means that people can move ahead without the fear of being stopped by a technicality, depending on their state’s law. And if there is evidence of fraud or error, they still have a legitimate right to contest it, just as if it were an in-state document. And just as you did.
LOL! That's what the law is....technicalities.
Why is it corporations can do as they wish and ignore technicalities while the individual person continues to be on the losing end of one?
Prima facia evidence my be valid on its face, but prosecuting someone without their ability to face their witness in a legal proceeding is a violation of basic Law.
It shouldn't matter if its the government doing the prosecuting or a corporation doing it, because the state is aiding and abetting the action, when they should be REQUIRING the contractual evidence before the case can even proceed.
THAT would be protecting the rights of the citizens under the authority they were delegated, IMHO.