Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
You are dreaming if you believe anything good will come from electing The Socialist Combiner. How can The Socialist Combiner be good for Republicans he votes more liberal than many OFFICIAL card-carrying Chicago Democrats? My Chicago machine appointed RAT state Rep. is not as liberal as Kirk. Does that make him a good Republican in your eyes?

Most of us learned from history after seeing how only the left benefited from "Republicans" like Jeffords, Chafee, and Specter in power. But you still can't accept that. How many times do RINOs have to deliver for the RATs before you figure it out?

93 posted on 10/09/2010 7:51:45 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: BillyBoy

No I am not dreaming when I realize that EVERY RAT defeat this term is critical to dismantling Urkle’s team and power.

In politics you must compromise from time to time and that is just what this vote will be. All the boogie men you list were all that could be expected from their states just as Kirk is all that can be expected from Illinois.

Brady won because of a crowded field not because conservative principles were overwhelmingly popular.

Kirk could not be beaten by more conservative candidates whether we like it or not. To stalk off in a snit because better candidates lost is not a mature reaction.

Why do you insist on acting as though Illinois votes like Idaho when you know damn well it does not.

The real “RINO” does not vote for his party’s candidate when the only alternative is a RAT.


111 posted on 10/13/2010 10:58:23 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson