Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stars & stripes forever
If Mark Kirk would pledge in writing to remain neutral on pro-life, pro-family issues, I may consider voting for him.

As I said in a previous thread:

Kirk is against "card check" (which would allow unions to organize without a vote).

He is against immigration amnesty and supports completing the border fence and sending more troops to the border.

He favors extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone.

He is against closing Gitmo

As a congressman, he voted against Obamacare and he has indicated that he wants to repeal it.

Giannoulias takes the opposite position on ALL of those things and more. Giannoulias would be our worst nightmare. Kirk must win!

6 posted on 10/07/2010 9:07:04 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Inyokern; FloridaSunrise; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; Liz; Velveeta; retrokitten; hoosiermama; ...

Talk about a former reputable publishing icon fallen to
ugly disrepute, this article will make your hair curl. It’s
the shocking story of a completely inappropriate and
deviant good old boy crew at the helm. I can’t imagine the
owner has let these stunning antics go on so long.

At Flagging Tribune, Tales of a Bankrupt Culture

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/06/business/media/06tribune.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all

~~~~~~~

Supporting Kirk today, and yet they were the lynchpin in
Obama’s senatorial win by getting the sealed Ryan divorce
info leaked JUST before the election, AND ...again, leaking
the info that Fitzie had Blago’s offices and home, etc.
wiretapped.

Quite the stunning change in both stability and political direction.


10 posted on 10/07/2010 9:23:39 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Inyokern
As I said in a previous thread:

This seat is not about Kirk, it is about who will be the Senate Majority Leader.

If Kirk vows to be neutral on social issues - then all Illinois Republicans will vote for him for the good of the Party.

27 posted on 10/08/2010 5:16:53 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever ( Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Inyokern; stars & stripes forever
Yes Inyokern, you did mention all that on another thread already debunked all your claims on that thread.

However, you chose to ignore it and continue to "report" the same false information about Kirk's beliefs, so I'm going to post them again, along with proof that Kirk is NOT "with us" on this stuff:

>> He is against immigration amnesty and supports completing the border fence and sending more troops to the border. <<

Numbers USA reports that Mark Kirk answered NO on whether he would oppose amnesty

Mark Kirk Opposes AZ Immigration Enforcement Law

Mark Kirk ran a Spanish language ad promising to help "reunite" Mexicans abroad with their families and said "Latinos deserve a Senator who will fight for them

>> He is against closing Gitmo <<

Mark Kirk voted YES on the Democrat bill authorizing the transferring of prisoners out of Guantanamo Bay.

Kirk caved to Democrats on bringing Gitmo terorrists to Illinois

>> As a congressman, he voted against Obamacare and he has indicated that he wants to repeal it. <<

Mark Kirk Backs Off "Repeal" Charge on Obamacare

Kirk Regretting Health Bill Repeal Pledge

Mark Kirk Refuses to Sign Republican Letter Asking AG Madigan to block Obamacare from being implimented in Illinois

So sorry, Inyokern, facts are facts and the facts show Kirk will do the same thing as Alexi when it comes to giving illegal alien's amnesty, shutting down Gitmo, and keeping Obamacare as the law of the land, regardless of what lies he told voters to win the primary. Now that you've been informed of Kirk's actual RECORD on the issues, please stop repeating his lies. China call itself "the people's Republic", but that doesn't prove it really is a people's Republic and "different" from Cuba's form of government. Likewise Kirk can say whatever he wants, but his record shows he supported the RATs on those issues.

28 posted on 10/08/2010 3:48:31 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Inyokern; stars & stripes forever; Maelstorm; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; PhilCollins; chicagolady; ...
Yes Inyokern, you did mention all that on another thread already debunked all your claims on that thread.

However, you chose to ignore it and continue to "report" the same false information about Kirk's beliefs, so I'm going to post them again, along with proof that Kirk is NOT "with us" on this stuff:

>> He is against immigration amnesty and supports completing the border fence and sending more troops to the border. <<

Numbers USA reports that Mark Kirk answered NO on whether he would oppose amnesty

Mark Kirk Opposes AZ Immigration Enforcement Law

Mark Kirk ran a Spanish language ad promising to help "reunite" Mexicans abroad with their families and said "Latinos deserve a Senator who will fight for them

>> He is against closing Gitmo <<

Mark Kirk voted YES on the Democrat bill authorizing the transferring of prisoners out of Guantanamo Bay.

Kirk caved to Democrats on bringing Gitmo terorrists to Illinois

>> As a congressman, he voted against Obamacare and he has indicated that he wants to repeal it. <<

Mark Kirk Backs Off "Repeal" Charge on Obamacare

Kirk Regretting Health Bill Repeal Pledge

Mark Kirk Refuses to Sign Republican Letter Asking AG Madigan to block Obamacare from being implimented in Illinois

So sorry, Inyokern, facts are facts and the facts show Kirk will do the same thing as Alexi when it comes to giving illegal alien's amnesty, shutting down Gitmo, and keeping Obamacare as the law of the land, regardless of what lies he told voters to win the primary. Now that you've been informed of Kirk's actual RECORD on the issues, please stop repeating his lies. China call itself "the people's Republic", but that doesn't prove it really is a people's Republic and "different" from Cuba's form of government. Likewise Kirk can say whatever he wants, but his record shows he supported the RATs on those issues.

29 posted on 10/08/2010 3:50:01 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Inyokern

There is what Mark Kirk says (bull$hit) and what Mark Kirk does (votes) and you have been repeatedly schooled on that in your liberal pushing threads.


168 posted on 10/26/2010 12:06:29 PM PDT by Grunthor (Tax cuts for the poor! If the poor can keep more money they may start hiring again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Inyokern; BlackElk; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; PhilCollins; chicagolady
>> He is against immigration amnesty and supports completing the border fence and sending more troops to the border. <<

Kirk has now flip-flopped on his "no amnesty" position. Not only that, he was one of fifteen Republicans to vote with the Dems to invoke cloture and advance the amnesty bill to the floor:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/20/in-reversal-mark-kirk-now-plans-to-support-immigration-bill

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/06/list-of-15-republican-senators-who-helped-democrats-to-advance-the-mega-amnesty-call-each-of-them-and-demand-that-they-vote-no-on-the-final-amnesty-vote-if-they-vote-for-the-final-amne-2462554.html

This comes after Kirk has ALREADY flip-flopped on all the other issues that Inyokern cited as conservative positions where Kirk was "with us" in November 2010:

"favors extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone". Kirk flip-flopped and voted NO on making the Bush tax cuts permannt.

"He is against closing Gitmo" Kirk flip-flopped and voted in favor of a Democrat bill to provide funds to close down Gitmo. (Fortunately Obama seems to be dead in the water on this issue because he can't convince anyone to put the inmates elsewhere)

"As a congressman, he voted against Obamacare and he has indicated that he wants to repeal it." As a Senator, he flip-flopped and said that although he voted against it, it is now "settled law" and he won't work to repeal it, instead he will help the public find out how they can benefit from it.

Just a friendly reminder for all the freepers who helped elect this socialist combiner and told us that he'd be "with us when it counts" and "we'll have his ear".

246 posted on 06/27/2013 2:25:09 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson