Hey Calcowgirl,
Tell me you think Labno has more than a one-in-a-million chance to win the senate seat and then we can talk about who is the liar.
The two are mutually exclusive. Again, fundamental.
Huh? Where did Calcowgirl even mention Labno's chances? I don't think she even mentioned his name. How can she "lie" about a candidate she never discussed?
Those of us who are backing Labno know he's a huge underdog since the liberal Obama media ignores him and is in the tank for Kirk. We are supporting him mainly as a protest vote against the three socialists. It would be great if he wins but we're under no illusions that it's likely to happen.
You really seem to grasping at straws trying to call us liars when I point out the fact all the Kirk backers here repeatedly give false information about his positions in order to get conservatives stomach him.
Nobody has said Labno is the likely winner in this race, or that Kirk and Alexi are 100% identical on every issue. But Kirk supporters have lied over and over again for months claiming he's "against activist judges", "never takes earmarks", "solid on immigration" "a pretty reliable fiscal conservative", "deployed to Iraq to defend our freedoms", the list goes on and on. And when they're presented with undeniable facts about his real record, many just head on over to other thread to continue trying to sell their false image of Kirk to conservatives.
One thing I've noticed about Kirk backers is they always seem to be the very image of the smear they hurl against others. That includes being "purist" Republicans who won't tolerate anyone here who doesn't do their bidding 100% of the time, habitual liars, and sympathetic to leftists and the Chicago media elite.