I have read historical narratives of 18th century sailors, who were at sea for several months, where they were deprived of female company. The more attractive of those male sailors became male prostitutes, and all of the male crew joined in the fun.
Of course, many gay leftists argue that anyone who criticizes the gay agenda is secretly gay, and this accustation is used to silence heterosexual men who may have had a stray thought in their high school locker rooms.
Are all homosexual men capable of becoming heterosexuals?
All men are capable of participating in same gender sex. But become a homosexual? Probably not. That's reserved for those who are dealing with varying degrees of family disfunction or events from their childhood in that particular manner.
Others who experienced similar things might become depressed or addicted to something (drugs, alcohol, food, gambling or whatever). Others would grow up and do just fine.
Ultimately, we do not choose what tempts us. But we do choose whether or not we will give in to that temptation.
It is 100% impossible for me to become a homosexual.
I am biologically attracted to the female form.
Male bodies look gross to me.
Bullcrap. And after the third martini every woman on the planet is bisexual.
Apparently, the student was so humiliated,(CBS news)
The young man, Clementi, was streaming his own sexual videos of himself and posting on a homosexual forum. This was not a case of a heterosexual harassing a homosexual as the young man that secretly streamed Clementi also had homosexual friends. There is a lot more to this story.
And the MSM is pushing that there have been 5 suicides this week. Ok. Are they keeping track of how many heterosexual suicides there have been in the same time period? No. That won't make it look like there's a suicide epidemic. Suicide rates are very high among homosexuals. Most have little to do with society and a great deal to do with their unhappiness.
“No, but we’re willing to learn...”
Judaism’s Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism Rejected Homosexuality
DENNIS PRAGER
...Human sexuality, especially male sexuality, is polymorphous, or utterly wild...
Among the consequences of the unchanneled sex drive is the sexualization of everything -— including religion. Unless the sex drive is appropriately harnessed (not squelched -— which leads to its own destructive consequences), higher religion could not have developed. Thus, the first thing Judaism did was to de-sexualize God: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” by his will, not through any sexual behavior. (snip)
http://catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/ho0003.html
Why should they? I'm a single woman and I don't find men with a "feminine side" attractive at all.
If you ask me, men need to get back in touch with their masculine side.
The question is one of nature or nurture and until a “gay gene” is identified, nurture remains the best explanation for a particular behavior.
I had a friend who came out of the closet, I’ll call him Dave, and another friend who was a bit more “metro” before the word ever became a cliche—I’ll call him Tom, but we were talking, and Dave said that his homo friends would find Tom rather attractive. I asked, what about me? He looked at me and shook his head, “No.” I had never been more relieved/insulted in my life.
Hetero woman here, and I think this is nonsense. If we're going to blame "society" there's a long list of ills in front of this one.
I think what happened at Rutgers was sick and sad, but I hear you saying that if only men were more open about their feelings (esp. about other men's attractiveness?) it could have been avoided. How, and really, what does one have to do with the other?
We've become an extraordinarly feminized culture -- if you've spent any time in the school system lately you can see if up close and personal. I think it's fair to say that boys today are more "in touch with their feminine sides" than at any point in our history. If anything, the problem is that "traditional" male roles are not appreciated or celebrated.
To answer the title question - no.
Homosexuality is a genetic and biological dead-end. Obligate homosexuals are incapable of reproducing themselves - which is a good thing.
Practicing homosexuals are either people suffering from a genetic defect, or so-called “normal” people (really individuals of weak wills and genetically deviant tendencies) who have acquired a particularly vicious vice due to influence from genetic homosexuals.
Here's a line But when a man notices that another man is very good-looking, he will not mention it openly, out of fear that other men will question his sexual orientation. It is hard for some men to openly state that a few men are better looking than many women, even if there is no sexual attraction involved
My guess is that that is not because most men are "insecure" about who they are; my guess is that most men don't care enough about how attractive another man is to actually notice on his own. It has to be pointed out to him, usually by a woman.
Keep the toilet seat down. There´s no excuse for men not sitting at home.
Replace the word 'homosexuality' with '(fill in the blank)', and the answer is 'YES'.
Speaking for myself I suppose I have a passing awareness of guys that look like they belong in a zombie movie, so I guess I also have an awareness of guys that look like they belong in a surfer movie. Having said that I would not want to use the word "attractive" since that presupposes that I would be sexually attracted to them. I can say quite honestly say that I've never seen a good looking guy and thought, "Damn, I wish I could sodomize him till he bleeds!"
“Are All Men Capable Of Becoming Homosexuals?”
If so, wouldn’t the reverse be true as well?
Yes, if they exhibit one or more of these traits:
Frequent visits to Demunderground
Frequent visits to DailyKos
Frequent watcher of State-Run-Media
Frequent listener to Air America
These types are confused, self-indulgent, mis-informed, and mis-adjusted to reality, and could stray to sexual deviance easily. Witness the types who appear there.....
This discussion is ASS-UH-NEIN.
Uhhhhhh, no.