[aSeattleConservative]

Nope, because either (1) it irks you sufficiently that I would continue to find much humor in your overwrought and blusterous reaction to it, or (2) it's true

Sigh; if only I were a Libertarian apologist of the homosexual movement, it very well might be true. The next correspondence I expect to hear from you will be the necessary information that I'll need to book your airline flight out here so that you can tell me to my face what only a coward would say over the internet.

I anxiously await our meeting.

[conimbricenses]

No. As with the last, the next correspondence will mock you, either for the truth in my insinuation about your NAMBLA proclivities or for the comical and oblivious way in which you have reacted to that insinuation, which is to say repeatedly asking me to arrange an in person meeting with you not unlike a NAMBLA member would do while preying on his next victim.

In either case, you look like a fool or worse.

[conimbricenses]

No. As with the last, the next correspondence will mock you, either for the truth in my insinuation about your NAMBLA proclivities or for the comical and oblivious way in which you have reacted to that insinuation, which is to say repeatedly asking me to arrange an in person meeting with you not unlike a NAMBLA member would do while preying on his next victim.

In either case, you look like a fool or worse.

[conimbricenses]

Tell ya what. Since you keep insisting, how about I take you up on the airfare offer? I only have a few stipulations of my own:

Buy me a round trip ticket to wherever the hell you live from ANY city of your chosing in the United States or Canada that is, oh, let's say east of the Mississippi or a contiguous northward line from its mouth. It will need to be a two part flight though with a week's layover in a destination of my choosing, most likely in Central or South America, followed by a flight from that location to yours, and a return through that same location for a layover on my return. So do we have a deal?