If you do not then why do we have to be condemned to live
in a socialist hell that Moonbeam would create.
Moonbean interest in getting back in the Gov office is to KILL PROP 13 .
Prop 13 was created in 1978 when he was Gov then.
He wants to kill it so his unions thugs can reap the benefits of massive prop tax increases .
Prop 13.....yada, yada....
Well, tell ya what. Meg might (I say might, because she changes her positions more often than she changes domestic help!) defend Prop 13, but what difference will it make if she gets to help the other rino’s push through Agenda 21 and other nonsense that she supports??
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2591740/posts?page=21#21
Meg Whitman: I’m A Huge Fan Of Van Jones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSn37TMXZO8
Meg Whitman: Van Jones Is ‘Doing a Marvelous Job’
[snip]Yes, she appears to be a progressive and has a recorded history of donating to other like-minded progressives like Barbara Boxer and John Kerry. (Note – see info below questions.) Furthermore she did give a generous donation to the Environmental Defense Fund to save the smelt: (http://www.kcbs.com/pages/5706219.php?). The smelt is quite the controversy here in California since saving the fish has caused the Delta water pumps to be shut off in our Central Valley. The Central Valley is our state’s agriculture land and without the flow of water, we are losing over $2 billion in agriculture annually.
From my Whitman research, her support for the delta smelt is aligned with her support of global warming as well. Back in 2008, the former EBay CEO, did join Jimmy Carter, Tom Daschle, Ted Turner and others on a Global Climate Cruise. (http://www.cartercenter.org/news/trip_reports/arctic_July2008.html). Personally I am also troubled by her CFR connections and Goldman Sachs involvement. She resigned from Goldman Sachs after questions regarding the board’s financial records: (http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0419/Goldman-Sachs-could-roil-California-governor-race).
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2598685/posts?page=58#58
Unlike your own rather poorly drafted and snarly posts, hers are always confined to the facts and the issues. I have never known her to take a position solely out of spite nor have I ever known her to attack another poster unless provoked beyond all reason (e.g., see your posts) and then only to defend herself.
As for Whitman v. Brown, that is a contest detested by all true conservatives on FR. We reject Jerry Brown because we know that Jerry Brown represents everything conservatives despise. Whitman is also a big problem for all the reasons the posters addressed by this post have already discussed in such a well composed and comprehensive manner. I am familiar with all of them, respect their comments and know them to be loyal conservatives. There isn't a kneejerk "pull the RINO lever" among this group. You might reflect on that.
You have made a very poor start with your posts on this thread. If you expect to do well on FR and enjoy the experience of interacting with our talented crew of conservatives, you are going to have to change your ways. If you sincerely want to be accepted around here, a good way to start would be with a prompt apology to calcowgirl. If you are unwilling or unable to do that, then I would suggest you either withdraw from FR or change your FR handle from ncalburt to something else. And, oh yes, when you begin posting under the your new FR handle, bring a more knowledgable and courteous attitude with you. You will find that far more rewarding.