Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shame on Family Films?
Patriot Post ^ | October 1, 2010 | L. Brent Bozell

Posted on 10/01/2010 8:49:58 AM PDT by rhema

Don't read Newsweek magazine while drinking a beverage. A spit take is the obvious first reaction to a column by Julia Baird headlined "The Shame of Family Films." On the Internet, this article is coded as "Why Family Films Are So Sexist."

Baird's denunciation of Hollywood's fraction of decent entertainment began: "They have all been smash hits: 'Finding Nemo,' 'Madagascar,' 'Ice Age,' 'Toy Story.' Fish, penguins, rats, stuffed animals, talking toys. All good innocent family fun, right? Sure, except there are few female characters in those films. There are certainly few doing anything meaningful or heroic -- and no, Bo Peep doesn't count."

So what does feminist bean-counting have to do with whether a movie is "good innocent family fun"? Did any young girl come away from "Finding Nemo" feeling like the memory-challenged Ellen DeGeneres fish character didn't represent female empowerment effectively? Were they offended by the oppressively archaic stereotype of Jessie the Yodeling Cowgirl during "Toy Story 2"? Families can't enjoy these films without expecting them to pass some politically correct quota exam?

The Newsweek columnist was promoting a new study from Stacy Smith and Marc Choueiti of the Annenberg School for Communications and Journalism at the University of Southern California. They reportedly analyzed 122 family films (rated G, PG and PG-13), including 50 top-grossing ones, between 2006 and 2009. She found it "startling" that there is "only one female character to every three male characters in family movies." (Well, not exactly -- they claim 29.2 percent of characters were female.)

Worse than that, Baird the Angry Feminist protested, "The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful." Well, that's scandalously unfair! (Don't think Baird wouldn't also protest if a certain number of women were ugly beyond repair.)

There's more. One in five female characters were "portrayed with some exposed skin between the mid-chest and upper thigh regions." If a conservative tried to suggest "The Little Mermaid" should put on a shirt, tell me Newsweek wouldn't point fingers and laugh. But that's what Newsweek's Angry Feminist is suggesting.

Baird was especially upset that cartoons might exaggerate the female physique: "One in four women was shown with a waist so small that, the authors concluded, it left 'little room for a womb or any other internal organs.' Maybe we could carry them in our purses?" Baird even claimed "another study" found "women in G-rated films wear the same amount of skimpy clothing as women in R-rated films."

That just sounds ludicrous. Anyone wanting to check on Baird's academic assertions would have trouble, since these two studies she's referring to cannot be found on the Annenberg School website or anywhere else online. The Annenberg study was commissioned by the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, which has been compiling data on women in film. Davis, the actress who most recently played the president on ABC, told Newsweek that 17 percent of animators are female, and women form 17 percent of crowd scenes in family films. Only 17 percent of narrators are female.

Ridiculous -- and funny, too. How nit-pickingly intricate are these studies to count genders in "crowd scenes"? WHO CARES? As for only 17 percent of females being narrators, does Davis find it distasteful if her husband reads a bedtime story?

But Davis isn't done with her feminist footnotes. She also claims research shows that the more TV a girl watches, the fewer options she believes she has in life, and the more a boy watches, the more his views become sexist. A look at the Geena Davis Institute website shows that her group is marshaling feminist research attacking on all of these fronts -- the dearth of female characters, animators, directors and so on -- with the entire panoply of TV and movies, not just the family films.

There's nothing wrong with seeking more female directors, producers or major characters in Hollywood -- they're supposed to be feminist enough to have already imposed "affirmative action." But for Newsweek to single out family films as somehow shameful is beyond unfair -- especially since none of them are truly singled out. Tell us how "Finding Nemo" or "Toy Story" are the work of sexist pigs.

Baird isn't just an Angry Feminist; she's a hypocrite, too. Last year, her own magazine tried to embarrass Sarah Palin by putting an old photo of her on the cover in running shorts, suggesting this Caribou Barbie wasn't ready for prime time. Did Baird protest? No, she defended the cover since Palin "has been photographed and filmed more than once in aerobic gear."

Newsweek, heal thyself.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: academicbias; anotherstudy; antibreeder; beancounting; culturewar; doublestandard; feminazi; feminism; geenadavis; heterophobia; hypocrite; identitypolitics; juliabaird; media; newsweak; newsweek; pravdamedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: rhema

Reminds me of the article about ten years ago when some woman complained about Disney characters’ cup sizes.


41 posted on 10/01/2010 10:33:29 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Esmeralda from The Hunchback of Notre Dame has to be the hottest Disney character ever


42 posted on 10/01/2010 10:35:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Texas Rangers - AL West Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I want Betty Boop back before the censors took her Boop-boop-be-doop away!


43 posted on 10/01/2010 10:35:23 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( AKA Rodrigo de Bivar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
Reminds me of the article about ten years ago when some woman complained about Disney characters’ cup sizes.

Seriously?


44 posted on 10/01/2010 10:36:04 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

45 posted on 10/01/2010 10:37:22 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
"The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful."

I wonder if she has discovered the Ru-Paul Drag U program.

She should stay home and watch that rather than go out an make a public nuisance of herself.

46 posted on 10/01/2010 10:42:21 AM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Jessica should never be faulted for her appearance. She was drawn that way.


47 posted on 10/01/2010 10:45:50 AM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“Sure, except there are few female characters in those films. There are certainly few doing anything meaningful or heroic — and no, Bo... “

She obviously didn’t see “Finding Nemo”, nor did she acknowledge that the “female” supporting character in that movie “stole the show” a number of times during the script, and portrayed a certain “heroic” sense to the character in spite of not being the “lead” character (Nemo).


48 posted on 10/01/2010 10:47:51 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The owner of Newsweek is Jane Harmon’s husband.

He bought it for $1 about 2 months ago.


49 posted on 10/01/2010 10:50:31 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
. . . boys won't go see a girl movie, but girls will go see a boy movie.

Exactly right. My girls could consistently beat me at the rather bloody video game Doom. I'm sure libtards would be appalled by all that violence, but the girls saw it as a video game challenge, nothing more.

All three grew up to be fine young ladies and not one of them grew up to be a bed wetting liberal.

50 posted on 10/01/2010 11:00:22 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rhema
History and the Bible attest to the hatred the world has for GOOD. Evil is what is accepted and pushed over ever decreasing moral standards. Only licentiousness is promoted on television in varying ways continually.

Television and most every other entertainment and news source is largely an abomination regarding standards and morality. We have become inured to it and certainly the youth accept it almost completely.

51 posted on 10/01/2010 11:05:59 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Well, by all means, let’s make these family movies more like TV where the men are stupid and the women are the ones runnin’ the families.

Or make them like ABC “Family” programming. You know ... good “family” shows like Friday Night Lights or Secret Life of the American Teenager. Yeah ... good family shows right there, eh?


52 posted on 10/01/2010 11:40:03 AM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
They reportedly analyzed 122 family films (rated G, PG and PG-13),

PG-13 family films? Some maybe can be like Indiana Jones, but Bevis and Butthead Do America was also PG-13 and certainly not a family film. James Bond movies are PG or PG-13 but I wouldn't let small kids watch that until they are older.

53 posted on 10/01/2010 11:52:21 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Tim Walberg, a true conservative republican for Congress - http://www.walbergforcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Every time I see the picture of Obama on the bike I laugh.

After laughing, I wonder how long until a picture of Putin bringing down a tiger bare-handed is posted. And I start counting...

54 posted on 10/01/2010 12:52:31 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
All the tv and movies in other categories have the guys being stupid, always needing women’s help to do anything. It’s just crazy.

It's crazy - AND it's not entertaining for straight men and women... (then again maybe film makers are only interested in the 4% of movie goers who are gay...)

55 posted on 10/01/2010 12:54:52 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
After laughing, I wonder how long until a picture of Putin bringing down a tiger bare-handed is posted. And I start counting...

"You want? I put in call for you request. Da!"


56 posted on 10/01/2010 12:56:24 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

The fact we have to point out to others when we see this, at least people we know and love and trust, is that portraying men this way - particularly white men - as fat, lazy, stupid, women and blacks and every other minority kicking their asses - is that this is deliberate portrayal by hollyweird and the media companies. This is the message that is being broadcast that kids and others are receiving and it’s reinforced as white guys are the only ‘minority’ group (we aren’t 50% or more of the population) that is legal and acceptable to portray this way.


57 posted on 10/01/2010 1:10:54 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
On the bright side, Hollywood - because of it's radical liberal elite portrayals, is dying.

There aren't enough haters of men - white men in particular - to support movies. The same is true of the MSM, print press, and assorted liberal 'art' groups. The hatred of all things traditional gets old quickly.

58 posted on 10/01/2010 1:19:45 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson