Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chilltherats
Apples and oranges. There’s no relationship between the two (malpractice insurer and medical coverage carrier).

Not so! Medical insurance coverage insures the patient against the medical costs of malpractice, with indemnity agreements. Settlement is based on projected medical costs of the insured's injury. But, the malpractice attorney usually negotiates a fractional repayment of those costs to settle with insurance company for the benefit of the plaintiff. So, malpractice costs go up, and insurance costs go up. Been there, done that.

108 posted on 09/30/2010 5:58:13 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul

The medical insurance carrier has nothing to do with pain and suffering damages and punitive damages.

The subject that I was addressing with the other poster was bogus malpractice claims, not legitimate claims wherein the patient actually needs ongoing care resulting from botched medical treatment.


109 posted on 09/30/2010 8:40:49 PM PDT by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson