Skip to comments.
U.S. Wants Broader Internet Wiretap Authority (More Intrusion from the One)
FoxNews.com ^
| September 27,2010
| FoxNews.com
Posted on 09/27/2010 7:03:18 AM PDT by luvie
The Obama administration is developing plans that would require all Internet-based communication services -- such as encrypted BlackBerry e-mail, Facebook, and Skype -- to be capable of complying with federal wiretap orders, according to a report published Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: intrusive; spy; wiretap; zerobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: LUV W
41
posted on
09/27/2010 9:40:53 AM PDT
by
left that other site
(Your MiQ-MaQ Paddy Wacky Bass-Playing Biker Buddy(El Kabong))
To: ShadowAce; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
42
posted on
09/27/2010 10:17:56 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: ilgipper
Remember that the Patriot Act was 98% identical to the proposal of Janet Reno. When a Democrat propsoes it most Democrats support it. When a Republican proposes it most Republicans support it.
Everyone tends to think that only the other side will abuse the power. Maybe the FBI sweep during Obma’s watch of self-described anti-war protestors will wake some on the left up to the reality that a powerful centralized government is intrinsically a danger to our freedoms and it is not a partisan issue.
(Whether I know all the details of the FBI sweep is irrelevant. What is relevant is the reaction of the activists.)
To: LUV W
Didn't like it when Bush and the Republicans in Congress used 9/11 to make the federal government more powerful and more intrusive, and sure as hell don't like it when Nobama and the Democrats in Congress want to do the same.
What's really pathetic is that there are liberals and conservatives who are such cowards that they will immediately support an increase in the government's power and reach. All it takes is one little story about a potential terrorist attack and they immediately go running for the government to protect them.
To: Gilbo_3
The short answer is “yes”.
To: left that other site
I closed my FB account. It was already getting too weird.Me too, last year. And I would never support that movie either, celebrating how they're tracking us (you know, without coming out and saying it, of course).
To: LUV W
Everybody is going to need SSL websites.
I notice Wikipedia has done that.
47
posted on
09/27/2010 3:10:18 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I have been reading about that, but am not sure exactly what it means. I am kind of an internet dork. LOL!
48
posted on
09/27/2010 3:24:38 PM PDT
by
luvie
(DIMs?......start packin'--you're fired!....I can see November from my house!)
To: LUV W
Secure Socket Layer (SSL, HTTPS) is an encrypted internet protocol used for business transactions so that servers between you and the website, including your ISP, cannot read the data (like your CC number) being transferred. But it is increasingly being used for general privacy such as the search engine Startpage: https://www.startpage.com/
49
posted on
09/27/2010 4:19:48 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Thanks for the info. I need to study this further! We have
to protect ourselves when government ceases to. Who trusts
them anyhow!
50
posted on
09/27/2010 4:26:14 PM PDT
by
luvie
(DIMs?......start packin'--you're fired!....I can see November from my house!)
To: servantboy777
Half your audience got turned off as soon as you went from war on terror to the war on some drugs, yet that unconstitutional abomination has been the single largest factor in the violation of the Constitution in the history of America. Too bad its cheerleaders here can’t get that through their thick heads!
51
posted on
09/27/2010 7:16:48 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
(A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
To: LUV W
But, but, but, when that EEEVILLLLL Bush did this to listen to terrorists, liberals were OUTRAGED.
52
posted on
09/28/2010 4:58:02 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson