Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southwest to acquire AirTran
CNN Money ^ | 9/27/2010 | Aaron Smith

Posted on 09/27/2010 5:40:44 AM PDT by Dan Nunn

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Southwest Airlines plans to acquire AirTran Holdings for $1.4 billion, the airlines said on Monday. Southwest (LUV, Fortune 500) said the deal values AirTran at $7.69 per share, a 69% premium over AirTran's closing price of $4.55 on Friday. AirTran's (AAI) stock surged to $7.27 in pre-market trading. Southwest chief executive officer Gary Kelly said the deal will allow his airline to expand into airports serving major hubs like Atlanta, Washington D.C., Boston, Baltimore and New York City. Southwest said the total deal, including AirTran's debt and aircraft operating leases, is valued at about $3.4 billion. The deal has been approved by the board of directors of each airline, and is now contingent upon the approval of regulators and AirTran stockholders.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Georgia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: airtran; southwest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Apparently this deal does not need to be approved by Southwest's pilot union, unlike their Frontier deal (which they lost to Republic).

Interesting how this will change their business model. AirTran flies 717's in addition to 737's. Southwest was talking about adding the 737-800 to their fleet, the first plane they'd ever operate that sat more than 137 people.

1 posted on 09/27/2010 5:40:46 AM PDT by Dan Nunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Southwest put up an informational site about the merger but it appears to be down under the load:

http://www.lowfaresfarther.com


2 posted on 09/27/2010 5:42:34 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Why, why, why? Oh well, I guess having one consistently profitable airline (Southwest) was making the industry look bad.


3 posted on 09/27/2010 5:49:49 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

This is not good. I relied on both these airlines to find low fares out of Orlando. Airtran has a lot of direct flights from here. Looks like my travel costs will be going up.


4 posted on 09/27/2010 5:51:06 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Glad to see Southwest is still an all Boeing fleet. Adding more -800s would be sweet for WA state.


5 posted on 09/27/2010 5:56:44 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

I like this news. Southwest is a profitable airline, they provide a decent service, and I’ll be glad to have them servicing the east coast more.

And they still don’t charge for the first 2 bags of checked luggage.


6 posted on 09/27/2010 5:58:39 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Interesting how this will change their business model. AirTran flies 717's in addition to 737's.

I don't think they're interested in the 717s at all, and will probably phase them out. What they wanted, and what is far more valuable, are the gates.

7 posted on 09/27/2010 6:00:56 AM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

There has to be some mighty happy pilots at Air Tran this AM...as well as the rest of the employees...


8 posted on 09/27/2010 6:05:22 AM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

AirTran has actually been phasing out the 717s in their fleet in favor of 737s. The RR engines on the 717s are pieces of dog squeeze...


9 posted on 09/27/2010 6:07:33 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

Wondering if SW will get gates at DFW?


10 posted on 09/27/2010 6:07:55 AM PDT by dusttoyou (Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Remember come November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Gotta LUV it!


11 posted on 09/27/2010 6:10:20 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("It's amazing, A man who has such large ears could be so tone deaf" Rush Limbaugh 9/8/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Now if Southwest would only take over Useless Air. (kidding)


12 posted on 09/27/2010 6:13:40 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou

Don’t forget about Hartsfield in Atlanta.

This is a big blow to Delta. No more going to Birmingham to get on a SWA flight.


13 posted on 09/27/2010 6:29:22 AM PDT by Dacula (Life is good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Yep, We fly into Orland from detroit or Flint. Air Tran has good fares and service. Recently bought a one way flight for my wife to Orlando Dec 23rd, nonstop, for $106, including seat choice! Well, maybe we can take bags now...

Mike

14 posted on 09/27/2010 6:40:28 AM PDT by MichaelP (Democrats are the party of Special Re-education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

Don’t mention Hartsfield, am trapped there as we speak.
But yes, SW will shake things up, for the better.
Delta is looking flush with $, every flight is almost full. It’ll do em good to get their ears trimmed back a bit by SW.


15 posted on 09/27/2010 6:43:57 AM PDT by dusttoyou (Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Remember come November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

You hit the nail on the head. One of the smartest things Southwest ever did was build their fleet around a single “family” of aircraft, the 737 series. That decision alone has saved them billions in training, fuel and equipment costs, which (in turn) helps SWA undercut the competition on fares.

The merger will also give Southwest a presence in markets they currently don’t serve, or have only a marginal presence. AirTran, for example, has gates at Boston’s Logan Airport, while much of SWA’s traffic (in that market) actually goes through Manchester, NH., roughly 90 miles away.

With access to larger markets, SWA will probably cut service to smaller, “nearby” airports. For example, why should Southwest maintain the same nbr of dlights into Islip when they will get AirTran’s gates at LaGuardia? And, in my neck of the woods, I’m guessing SWA will close AirTran’s gates at the Newport News, VA airport and force passengers to fly out of Norfolk, where Southwest has operated for years.

One thing is certain: air fares in/out of Atlanta will be very cheap. AirTran was very successful at taking away market share from Delta—and AirTran never had the financial reserves of SWA. Delta is still financially troubled, and the merger with Northwest didn’t help. SWA will launch a major fare war in Delta’s backyard to further weaken their competition.

Also, how long will Delta’s bag fees last with SWA coming to Hartsfield?


16 posted on 09/27/2010 7:19:24 AM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou
Wondering if SW will get gates at DFW?

SWA would acquire all of AT's assets & liabilities. So they would get the gates.

I'm not sure Delta will be the most impacted. I think it will be AA and UA.

17 posted on 09/27/2010 7:23:58 AM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One
From the Dallas Morning News Airline blog:

f you're Southwest, your doing this because your strategy requires it. Southwest is building a business traveler network that had a huge hole in it called Atlanta and Points From Atlanta, and AirTran has real market share ever since Delta Air Line's pricing guys took a sort of "peaceful coexistence" approach to AirTran instead of trying, say, a Northwest Airlines pricing approach that I'd call "Terminate with Extreme Prejudice."

The planes fleets between the airlines fit well enough, AirTran employees are eventually going to get raises, and Southwest's stranglehold on domestic traffic just got that much deeper. For an airline that has simply lost the interest of Wall Street -- through not much fault of its own -- in the past decade or so, it's a wake-up call to the finance world: We're back, and we're not taking prisoners.

Comments have indicated that Southwest will inactivate, sell or trade the gates at DFW. They have pledged not to operate out of DFW in order to get the Wright amendment lifted and get a new expansion at Love Field.

Let's hope that the pledge lasts longer than a politicians' promise.

18 posted on 09/27/2010 7:31:46 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Kiss business class on AirTran goodbye...


19 posted on 09/27/2010 7:36:16 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland (www.wilsonfornewyork.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Oh, I heart Southwest....
YAY!


20 posted on 09/27/2010 7:49:10 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson