Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

While U.S. is distracted, China develops sea power
Washington Post ^ | Sept. 26, 2010 | Robert D. Kaplan

Posted on 09/27/2010 4:16:04 AM PDT by nuconvert

The greatest geopolitical development that has occurred largely beneath the radar of our Middle East-focused media over the past decade has been the rise of Chinese sea power. This is evinced by President Obama's meeting Friday about the South China Sea, where China has conducted live-fire drills and made territorial claims against various Southeast Asian countries, and the dispute over the Senkaku Islands between Japan and China in the East China Sea, the site of a recent collision between a Chinese fishing trawler and two Japanese coast guard ships.

-excerpt-

China has the world's second-largest naval service, after only the United States. Rather than purchase warships across the board, it is developing niche capacities in sub-surface warfare and missile technology designed to hit moving targets at sea. At some point, the U.S. Navy is likely to be denied unimpeded access to the waters off East Asia. China's 66 submarines constitute roughly twice as many warships as the entire British Royal Navy. If China expands its submarine fleet to 78 by 2020 as planned, it would be on par with the U.S. Navy's undersea fleet in quantity, if not in quality. If our economy remains wobbly while China's continues to rise -- China's defense budget is growing nearly 10 percent annually -- this will have repercussions for each nation's sea power. And with 90 percent of commercial goods worldwide still transported by ship, sea control is critical.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinesenavy; navy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2010 4:16:05 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

bump


2 posted on 09/27/2010 4:18:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

It’s amazing how China’s military expansion has coincided with the expansion of the left in the West.

Amazing.

IMHO


3 posted on 09/27/2010 4:31:43 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
The U.S. is not distracted. It is occupied by Domestic Terrorist who run rampant in DC and eventually all across the Country.

They call themselves DEMOCRATS.

4 posted on 09/27/2010 4:33:07 AM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

"we can absorb it"

5 posted on 09/27/2010 4:38:41 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Yes 40 yrs of systematic Infrastructure dismantling and technology transfers where a blur


6 posted on 09/27/2010 4:42:16 AM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Smart. They nation build their own nation while we nation build Iraq Afghanistan Haiti and the African continent.


7 posted on 09/27/2010 4:44:11 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

translation: Being completely and purposely ignored by the idiot in the WH.


8 posted on 09/27/2010 4:45:58 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Title should read:

“With the factories, money and technology the U.S. outsourced to it via ‘free trade’, China develops sea power”


9 posted on 09/27/2010 4:47:51 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (GOP establishment are dinosaurs. Tea Party is a great big asteroid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

China is developing systems for total war, conventional and cyber war. Meanwhile, ozero is downgrading our military, weakening our economy, cutting off our fuel supples, flashing weakness to the world, almost inviting an attack, partying like a rock star all to the adoring praises of our so called media.

wow.


10 posted on 09/27/2010 4:49:05 AM PDT by Texas resident (Outlaw fisherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Whether or not the US is/was distracted, what exactly should have been or be done to curb China’s developing sea power?


11 posted on 09/27/2010 4:50:21 AM PDT by stuartcr (Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I imagine it’s taken a lot longer than just 2 yrs for all this to happen.


12 posted on 09/27/2010 4:51:41 AM PDT by stuartcr (Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I think its awesome that they’re using the $$ they make from selling us manufactured goods. And they’re making those manufactured goods with OUR factories that we willingly outsourced to them.

Between liberalism, political correctness and our relentless de-Industrialization, there are times when I think we are the biggest idiots in history.

Carbon credits anyone??


13 posted on 09/27/2010 4:55:14 AM PDT by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
If China expands its submarine fleet to 78 by 2020 as planned, it would be on par with the U.S. Navy's undersea fleet in quantity, if not in quality

During the Cold War, I can remember the Soviets having over 50 subs AT SEA at a given time. We found out quality matters far more than numerical superiority in submarine operations. Even in ten years, I doubt China will be able to match the technical/operational quality of US SSNs/GNs/BNs. It's a very slow learning curve.
14 posted on 09/27/2010 4:55:38 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

It’s something the clintons couldn’t sell to the Red Chinese.


15 posted on 09/27/2010 5:06:52 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

On top of that, we’re tracking them as soon as they leave port.


16 posted on 09/27/2010 5:22:36 AM PDT by stuartcr (Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
China's 66 noisy submarines would be fish bait inside of one hour from our subs and our navy's aircraft carriers would deliver more ordnance in that hour to make the bombing of Tokyo seem like a picnic. Shoot, no EU country has been able to produce a community of motivated military personnel in the post ww2 era that can do effective carrier and sub war tactics. And that goes for Russia and China as well. The only place either one of them wins is infantry, overwhelming numbers and on land. Navy? Dont make me laugh.
17 posted on 09/27/2010 5:24:46 AM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Travis McGee

Perhaps of interest.


18 posted on 09/27/2010 5:32:48 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

How about, “Growing Chinese Navy Threatens U.S. Sea Power; Protectionists Say Boycott Wal-Mart.”


19 posted on 09/27/2010 5:49:45 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Which led to the PRC’s war plan to take Taiwan. It was called “the million man swim.”
20 posted on 09/27/2010 5:50:58 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson