Posted on 09/27/2010 3:57:57 AM PDT by Leisler
When USC professor and transportation expert James Moore heard the findings several days ago that the $9 billion Subway to the Sea won't relieve congestion on the Westside, as vowed by Antonio Villaraigosa, Moore was among a number of transportation insiders who wasn't stunned.
"I didn't need an Environmental Impact Report to know that," says Moore, iconoclastic director of transportation engineering at USC, referring to an environmental study by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
Moore says the truth about how Metro plans to use up to $9 billion in sales taxes being paid by 8 million consumers in Los Angeles County is: "We're not building [a subway] to ease congestion. We're doing it for political reasons."...........
(Excerpt) Read more at laweekly.com ...
The idea is to move people, not have a monument. Light rail is hundreds of time more expensive per passenger per mile than alternatives, which already exist, which would mean no union skim, hack contractors, welfare for the finance class.
The idea is to move people, not have a monument.
Monorails don't get stuck in gridlock like cars and buses do.
But, but won’t the subway be the first to flood when the seas rise due to glo-bull warming?
James Moore is a hardcore supporter of Sustainable Development. Antonio Villaraigosa has been working with ICLEI for years to promote Agenda 21. It never fails; every time you see anything dealing with passenger rail, the people behind it support this globalist agenda.
Thanks jim... conservatives know that we can always rely on you libertarians for your dumbed-down lack of class.
“big repair maintenance bills forever.”
Well that’s one way to maintain demand for your skills: do a lousy job and then the state will keep hiring you to fix what should have been done right in the first place.
The Third world Gang Bangers will hop on and ride down to Santa Monica and rob, rape and murder the rich elites in Santa Monica.
If they were popular, they would at the station have gridlock, but they are not popular, so they never suffer from over use, like the immensely popular roads do.
He said they were ordered to do it according to plans and specs.
Private buses leasing private ROW eliminate connections, and are not as subject to the inevitable breakdown, strike, or act of tyranny.
But then, you know all about tyranny, don't you Wille? There isn't a single big-budget proposal you have ever made here that isn't subject to centralized command and control.
Cars equipped with collision avoidance on intelligent freeways will soon carry far more passengers per hour than any rail system you can conjure, even beyond your usual pack of lies.
LOL. I think I would want rubber bumpers on those. Might even make them more fun.
WooHoo!
Aerial bumper cars!
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.