[tlb]

Considering the board nearly melted down that she would dare go into the same room with the sinners, it's odd the incident passed without comment. To balance the hysterics and nuts who previously said Coulter lost them for this betrayal, the hysterics and nuts on the other side say now they hate her even more:

http://lezgetreal.com/2010/09/goproud-pays-lots-of-money-to-be-demeaned-by-homophobic-racist/

[Jaxter]

[DJ MacWoW]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

[fwdude]

I'd like to her whether she supports some sort of recognition like civil unions, though. Bets are that she does.

To be fair, the National Organization for Marriage also tacitly supports this, which angers me to no end.

[xzins]

At the time, I said that Ann Coulter was wrong to give credence to the GOProud group. I said that Farah was wrong to publish personal emails to him from Coulter.

I continue to believe that.

I wanted her to say: It is "You are not conservatives." She didn't say that it was impossible for a gay to be a conservative (which is the truth.)

In fact the head of GOProud picked up on that and said:

GOProud's executive director, Jimmy LaSalvia, told TPM after the speech, "I don't agree with Ann Coulter about gay marriage, but there was a real conversation here. That's what we're trying to start." He added, "We want people to see that it isn't 'us versus them.'" As an organization, he explained, GOProud focuses strictly on federal issues which means that, institutionally, they don't take a position on state policy issues like same sex marriage. Unlike the Log Cabin Republicans who exist, according to LaSalvia, to push from many of the same agenda items as the "gay left," GOProud seeks to redefine what are "gay" issues and push for issues of the largest importance to the LGBT community.

So, the part I disagreed with is what Ann Coulter accomplished. She allowed them to state that a "conversation had begun."

That means it looks like "all the family, sitting around the kitchen table, discussing family stuff."

Homosexuality can never be part of the conservative family.

[Tired of Taxes]

I’m not a fan of Coulter, but the woman spoke the truth at this convention. I don’t agree with everything she says, but I agree with what she reportedly said at this convention.

[Scythian]

She’s a dope, I have no respect for her anymore.

[Ol' Sparky]

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/42711.html

Coulter’s talk drew a mixed response, but her presence marked the increasingly mainstream Republican embrace of gay rights. Coulter had a falling out with a conservative website that has published her, WorldNetDaily, over her attendance. “She’s doing something important – she’s showing her base that it’s OK,” said one attendee, Michael Lucas. (Lucas also confided to a reporter, “I wonder what Ann will think about the fact that I am the biggest producer of gay porn on the East Coast and probably in the whole U.S."

[aSeattleConservative]

I must have missed the part where Coulter told them that their lifestyle is immoral, an abomination in the eyes of God, and that our Founding Fathers found homosexuality to be a “disgrace to humanity”.

Coulter obviously tried to straddle the white line running down the middle of the highway on this issue.

What happens to people that stand out in the middle of the road?

[EternalVigilance]

Bottom line, no matter what she said:

Money and recognition were gained by deceivers who are pushing the sodomite agenda on America.

[Antoninus]

Good for her! I wonder how the speech was received by the attendees...