Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thirty years of China's one-child policy (A leftist celebration)
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | 10/25/2010 | Malcolm Moore

Posted on 09/25/2010 8:45:18 PM PDT by Soothesayer

Yang Zhizhu knew the dire consequences of breaking China's one-child policy. He would be stripped of his professorship at a Beijing university and hit with such a large fine that his family would be destitute.

But when he found out that his wife, Chen Hong, was pregnant for the second time aged 38, they decided they could not let the opportunity pass.

"We never planned this, but despite the problems we knew it would cause, we were over the moon," he said. "How much longer can the one-child policy last, anyway?"

When China introduced its drastic population controls, officials promised that it would lift them after 30 years - an anniversary which falls this weekend. Aware of the resentment the policy would cause, the government said it was a temporary measure in response to China's high unemployment and food scarcity.

"In 30 years, when our current extreme population growth eases, we can then adopt a different population policy," read the announcement from the Communist Party Central Committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; china; onechild
Check out the horrible comments at the bottom. Leftists are the same everywhere.

These commie monsters are the most lethal virus ever faced by humanity. We purged Polio and Smallpox. If only we showed 1% of that dedication towards this far greater blight! They need to be "vaccinated" wherever and whenever we find them.

Remember the faces of their victims. Look at faces of the children in that photo. How easily either of them could have been tossed alive into the furnace. This and worse happens every day in China.

Whenever you find a leftist in the workplace, in the neighborhood, the pub, or anywhere let them know they have incurred interest payable only in blood.

1 posted on 09/25/2010 8:45:22 PM PDT by Soothesayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

It’s a shame their nation wasn’t invaded by Muslims instead of Europe. Try telling THOSE people that the government limits them to one child...


2 posted on 09/25/2010 9:21:42 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

The one child policy has been most lethal to girls leading to a skewed population in terms of the ratio of male to female.


3 posted on 09/25/2010 9:27:26 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
One child for a muzzie, myself I would prefer -1. Every child they try to have a parent dies, and it should be the male as they are the true scum of that so called religion. There is a muzzie invasion going on in China but at least China does know how to deal with it, just kill em when they cause an uprising.
4 posted on 09/25/2010 9:59:43 PM PDT by SledgeCS (If this is an example of a transparent government, I would hate to see what a secret one is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
It’s a shame their nation wasn’t invaded by Muslims instead of Europe.

Please, they had a hard enough time with the Europeans, not to mention the Japanese. Wishing muslim culture on them is just plain cruel.

5 posted on 09/25/2010 11:59:55 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xp38
The one child policy has been most lethal to girls leading to a skewed population in terms of the ratio of male to female.

That has changed a bit in the developed cities of China. Woman have considerable earning power in China, especially at foreign companies setting up there.

On the couple in the story, it sounds like the problem was they could not afford to pay for the social services the state requires they pay for a second child. For those that can afford them, the policy is relaxed.

6 posted on 09/26/2010 12:03:35 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

The two deserve each other?


7 posted on 09/26/2010 2:00:49 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

It’s a shame that life exists in the first place. The tragedy here is that innocent children are being exterminated after they already come into being. If would be just as bad if Islam conquered China.

It is always the innocent who pay the price. We could slaughter 100 million leftists and they will still win because they can brainwash the youth. There is absolutely no hope of stopping them but we can still torture and execute them out of vengeance. Just make their final victory as painful as possible.


8 posted on 09/26/2010 11:28:14 AM PDT by Soothesayer (“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson