[Sloth]

Having watched this, I have two observations. 1.) The person operating the camera knows how to say “It’s my First Amendment right” over and over again but has apparently never actually read the amendment in question. 2.) I fully support the use of physical force to eject unwelcome behavior on private property.

[penelopesire]

I have only one observation so far....That was an assault and should be prosecuted as such. The thug had no right to hit the camera dude in the face. He should have called the cops to remove the dude.

[Drango]

I fully support the use of physical force to eject unwelcome behavior on private property.

Agreed. Where we differ perhaps is the amount of force. You may use reasonable force to insure your property rights. You may not assault someone.

What I saw was an assault and an unreasonable use of force. I believe a jury would find the same.

[Gondring]

Having watched this, I have two observations. 1.) The person operating the camera knows how to say “It’s my First Amendment right” over and over again but has apparently never actually read the amendment in question. 2.) I fully support the use of physical force to eject unwelcome behavior on private property.

It's good to see another conservative here. :-)

[Spacetrucker]

2.) I fully support the use of physical force to eject unwelcome behavior on private property.

---

I may be wrong, but doesn't a place of "private property" cease for a time being private property to an extent when a publicly advertised "public event" is held on the premises?