A public figure (governor) giving a public speech has no right to expect or demand recording not be done. Period.
I do believe this would, given a good lawyer (what’s that?), be a very lucrative lawsuit.
But what is most troubling - what was being hidden?
“But what is most troubling - what was being hidden?”
Probably trying to protect their tax exempt status. It was taking place at a church. ???
It was on private property. I guess we've lost the right to decide what we allow on our own property?
>A public figure (governor) giving a public speech has no right to expect or demand recording not be done. Period.<
It appeared to me that a leader of the church a woman was the one who asked for the cameras to be put away. Which I can see no reason for unless they were disturbing the speech (it did not appear so)
>But what is most troubling - what was being hidden?<
Exactly.
I would also like to know if the men who accosted him were arrested. This type of behavior can not go unchallenged. Posting video is fine, but someone needs to suffer consequences for these actions or else it makes it hard on the next person who gets assaulted.
My guess is that they were concerned about the tax ramifications of using the church for a partisan event. Can’t have any evidence of that.