[Blueflag]

Thank you for that post.

That would seem to be prima facie evidence that the officers were justified in asking for ID.

Always good to find a citation.

Thank you sir.

[grady]

Really? For that to be true, you must see something in this fact pattern to demonstrate that "the officer reasonably suspect[ed] that such person [was]committing, [was]about to commit or ha[d] committed a crime.."

Ok...I'll bite...please let me know what part of going about their day engaged in lawful activity gave these officers reasonable suspicion that these gentlemen had committed or were about to commit a crime?

[zeugma]

That would seem to be prima facie evidence that the officers were justified in asking for ID.

Nope. Read it again.

968.24 Temporary questioning without arrest. After having identified himself or herself as a law enforcement officer, a law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place for a reasonable period of time when the officer reasonably suspects that such person is committing, is about to commit or has committed a crime, and may demand the name and address of the person and an explanation of the person’s conduct. Such detention and temporary questioning shall be conducted in the vicinity where the person was stopped.

Don't see anything here about producing identification. You do have to identify yourself if they ask, but said identification can be verbal.