[grady]

Really? For that to be true, you must see something in this fact pattern to demonstrate that "the officer reasonably suspect[ed] that such person [was]committing, [was]about to commit or ha[d] committed a crime.."

Ok...I'll bite...please let me know what part of going about their day engaged in lawful activity gave these officers reasonable suspicion that these gentlemen had committed or were about to commit a crime?

[Blueflag]

Sadly reasonable suspicion was not the issue. (I agree with you BTW)

I forget which posts it was/were, but there were two citations in this thread — one concerning WISCONSIN law, and the other a court decision — which pointed out that the CURRENT LAW permits and empowers the officers to ask for ID, just because.

Sad but seemingly true.

[stuartcr]

Carrying a weapon if you are a felon, is a crime. How would the police know you were not a felon, unless he checked?