Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Oh no I disagree. Half of the first comments were attcking him on the belief he was continuing his previous rants. A belief they were given to by the original poster, but they should have have done some investigating before commenting on the matter. I’ve gone off unchecked at times myself but it doesn’t make it right and Rove should be addressed for what he’s actually done. Not for what he did not do.


140 posted on 09/22/2010 7:02:52 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (“I was there when we had the numbers, but didn’t have the principles.”---Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Soul Seeker

“A belief they were given to by the original poster, but they should have have done some investigating before commenting on the matter. I’ve gone off unchecked at times myself but it doesn’t make it right...”

True, they shouldn’t attack him for things he didn’t say, but it’s tough to verify statements from a show that just aired if you didn’t see it, and there’s no link up on youtube yet. Considering Rove’s previous statements and how widely disseminated they were, I’m sure a lot of people didn’t think there was any reason to think this post suspect.

The original poster should issue a retraction, or some clarification about what “railing” was going on that nobody else seemed to notice.


152 posted on 09/22/2010 7:11:03 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson