Not because we had a leader of your ilk in the White House, chump.
We’ll need to absorb a major terrorist attack so that we’ll be able to justify shutting down talk radio and seizing control of all content on the internet.
Obama absolutely is not fit to be commander in chief. He is surrendering in Afghanistan, against the advice of all his generals. He is allowing an open border in the United States so that we can’t defend ourselves. If any state or city attempts to defend itself against illegal aliens, President Obama sues them.
Our president’s says our only response to terrorist threats is to “absorb them”. Whose side is he on?
Would he say that if the White House was the target?
Looks like O is complimenting Pres Bush.
We are now absorbing a constant terrorist attack, 24/7/365.
It is coming from the muslim sympathizing, terrorist enabling, socialistic one-worlder we have for a president, aided and abetted by his entire handpicked cabinet and staff comprised entirely of ultra left wing America haters.
Of course we can absorb another attack, but how stupid is it for a president to say it? It shows his mindset.
The reason why Obama’s comment is so bad is because he is using it as an excuse for refusing to defend us against it. The attitude is “Yes, we would be safer by destroying the terrorists in our own source, but we’ll just have to absorb it because I don’t want to.” In the book Obama said we were withdrawing because he would “lose the entire Democratic Party” if he didn’t withdraw. He also said it would cost a lot of money and he wants to spend that elsewhere.
So the president of the United States is admitting that he is opening us to terrorist attacks for political reasons. If Chicago or New York gets hit by terrorists, we are just supposed to suck it up and “absorb it”, because Obama doesn’t want to “lose the Democratic Party” in the next election, and because he wants to spend the money on giving welfare to more people.
...tis but a scratch...
islamist Treason
“Our Afghan policy was focused as much as anything on domestic politics,” an Obama adviser at the time told Peter Baker of the New York Times. “He would not risk losing the moderate to centrist Democrats in the middle of health insurance reform and he viewed that legislation as the make-or-break legislation for his administration.”
he [Obama] set a withdrawal timetable because, “I can’t lose the whole Democratic Party.”
There's a lot of things Oboma has said and done that proves he's not fit for the presidency.
The moral of this story? Never give an affirmation action presidency to an unqualified community organizer.
Yep, WHERE ARE THE JOBS?
You meant “Shame! WOW!”, right? Kidding, I know what you meant, but it is indeed shameful.
I’d like to see what zero would do if his precious azz was threatened by an “absorbable” terrorist attack, lol! That pansy would run for the nearest rathole he could find and leave the sife and kiddies in the dust.
Bolton is right. Of course zero’s not fit to be CiC. He’s not fit to kiss the azz of one average taxpayer or to lick the ground one American soldier walks on.
We could absorb a terrorist attack. In fact, it would be a crisis you can be sure we wouldn’t let go to waste”
I fear that we will all pay a terrible price before this insouciant egomaniac’s first, and only, term expires.
He’s a moron. He’s only there for appeasement and the perks. Vacation gal has probably threatened to kick his skinny a$$ if he doesn’t make sure she keeps her chushy lifestyle for the full 8 years. I despise these lowlifes.
We be movin’ on up now and we be lovin’ it.
What an ignorant, GD monster he is. I wonder how many deaths we can absorb under his healthcare bill?
and 0bama takes another one in the...........HA ha!!!
