Was it really necessary for the article to call the Obama children ‘brats’? I mean they are just kids. It tainted the rest of the article for me.
Was it really necessary for the article to call the Obama children ‘brats’? I mean they are just kids. It tainted the rest of the article for me.
__________________________________
I agree wholeheartedly GOPPachyderm. Nothing is to be gained by making targets of people’s children that have done nothing to deserve it. PLUS who among us would like their children called brats for no reason?
Also, this blog or whatever, that this appeared in has used an article from 8/09! It is at the link provided by ilovesarah2012 in post 11.
Not sure why this is just appearing now, but the site that posted it is a day late and a dollar short.
__________________________________________
Do you mean to say that up to that point you were buying this?
While I agree with you, I do want to point out that the term "brats" pales in comparison to what libs have said about children of conservatives. The press and bloggers have treated Sarah Palin's children in particular very badly.
They should be ashamed of doing that, of course, but libs have no shame.
Calling Obama’s daughters “brats” tainted the article for me, too. Say what you want about those in the public eye, but I don’t like it when remarks like that are made about the children of politicians.