Skip to comments.
Oh Oh.... Does Someone Smell Something?
The Market Ticker ^
| 9-20-2010
| Karl Denninger
Posted on 09/20/2010 8:08:56 AM PDT by blam
Edited on 09/20/2010 8:48:10 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at market-ticker.org ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailouts; denninger; foreclosures; gmac; housing; ticker
1
posted on
09/20/2010 8:08:59 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
We bought a house earlier this year. It was not a foreclosure. The Realtor actually asked me, “do you want to do a title search and buy title insurance?” I said, “why heck yes, who the hell would buy a house without title insurance?”
His casual reply was, “oh lots of people do to save money, especially if you know the previous owner has been in the house for twenty years or more.”
Obviously I don't belong in these times.
To: blam
3
posted on
09/20/2010 8:19:12 AM PDT
by
phockthis
To: blam
Every sentence, including the title, ends in a question mark. Presumably Denninger wants us to assume the answer in every case is “Yes” but with absolutely no evidence provided. I don’t care for that journalistic or analytical style.
4
posted on
09/20/2010 8:19:46 AM PDT
by
babble-on
To: I cannot think of a name
Title insurance saved me $3000.00 during the closing of a house in 2006. I was told the property had a lien. I produced my title insurance which showed a clear title. I did not have to pay the supposed lien.
5
posted on
09/20/2010 8:19:53 AM PDT
by
Bronzy
To: Bronzy
Me too.
Title insurance is cheap.
6
posted on
09/20/2010 8:21:15 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
I'll wager that almost none of these mortgage companies could produce a Title if they were ordered to by the Courts.
L
7
posted on
09/20/2010 8:23:59 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: blam
As best I recall from the LONG list of fees associated with buying the house in the 90’s, title insurance was a tiny little number. Why would anyone NOT buy it?
8
posted on
09/20/2010 8:28:42 AM PDT
by
nina0113
To: blam
The mortgages were sliced, diced and julianned in so many ways to divide up the risk and terms of interest payments that many forgot that the mortgage is an actual legal document that they needed to keep track of who still held it. I expect that many foreclosures could be stopped just by the demand that the foreclosing company produce the actual mortgage to prove that they actually held it rather than a share of the rights to the interest through some investment vehicle.
9
posted on
09/20/2010 8:32:42 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: blam
Oh Oh.... Does Someone Smell Something? What's Obama cooking now?
10
posted on
09/20/2010 8:36:11 AM PDT
by
al_c
(http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
To: blam
In time like these, Title Insurance is very important...........
11
posted on
09/20/2010 8:50:38 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
To: blam
*sniff* *sniff*
I detect a whiff of ozone, and kitten,...
(Nah, only teasing.)
12
posted on
09/20/2010 9:01:56 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: nina0113
$229 on a house costing $132,000 in our county in Arkansas. I just looked it up, so about 1.75%.
13
posted on
09/20/2010 9:25:38 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: blam
Could it be that Obama ‘liened’ on them to stop foreclosing on the Dem voter base?
14
posted on
09/20/2010 9:25:59 AM PDT
by
Oratam
To: kcvl
kcvl said:
"$229 on a house costing $132,000 in our county in Arkansas. I just looked it up, so about 1.75%." That would be 0.175 %.
To: William Tell
Yes, I realized that once I posted it.
Thanks for correcting it for me.
16
posted on
09/20/2010 9:42:00 AM PDT
by
kcvl
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson