Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's the real reason Karl Rove flipped out on Christine O'Donnell
Business Insider ^ | 9-17-10 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 09/18/2010 3:06:26 PM PDT by STARWISE

The night Christine O'Donnell won the GOP nomination for Senate in Delaware, party stalwart Karl Rove flipped out, and warned that she was a liar, of ill-character, and generally not the kind of person that the party should get behind.

It only took an instant for other party leaders like Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin to flip out right back at him. But why did Rove take this tack? It's not because he's not into right-wingers

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assassin4romney; christineodonnell; crybabyrove; establishment; guerrillapolitics; karlrove; newbreed; newsheriffintown; palin; rino; rinorove; romney; romneybrownshirt; romneyhenchman; rove; roverino; ryb; sarahpalin; tokyorove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last
To: maine-iac7
I think it's totally irresponsible to opine such things about ANYONE on the world wide web without solid evidence to back it up.
waiting.


Wait and be damned. I stated clearly that I had no evidence but I compared his tantrums with Andrew Sullivan.

Get thy panties out of a wad.
141 posted on 09/18/2010 7:10:58 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
He has been rather bitchy all week.
Be interesting to see him do the rounds on the alphabet channels in the morning.


"Rove, that _______________ bastard"

[add your own descriptor]
142 posted on 09/18/2010 7:13:32 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thank you for the pings, STAR.

The Establishment Bastard is going down. Good riddance!


143 posted on 09/18/2010 7:18:54 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Thankyou, FRiend.


144 posted on 09/18/2010 7:24:44 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight (Don't make me use uppercase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Watch tomorrow .. you’ve been pingylingied .. ;)


145 posted on 09/18/2010 8:16:35 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight

We need to be the financiers too and contribute to campaigns in 2010 and 2012 like we never have before. I sending a check up north to O’Donnell.


146 posted on 09/18/2010 8:21:20 PM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl; eddie willers; mkjessup; unsycophant

>>> I keep hearing the words “ruling class” and “elites” used, reminds me of some kind of south american revolution with a mob. Disgusting.

It gets worse then a mob of South American peasants. The whiny inferiority complex on display sounds more like an Edwards rally. Seriously.

>>> You know what I think? I think Rove is queer.

People were outraged when the teabagger slur was applied to the tea party participants. But it’s interesting how eagerly the O’Donnell fans jump into the same mudpit. There was a big “gay Rove” thread a couple of days ago. It was like a Special Olympics event.

At least the left was making a slightly witty play on words. The O’Donnell fans seem to just embrace the bile and skip the cleverness or wit altogether.


147 posted on 09/18/2010 8:44:38 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

“He could have been more gracious about it”. No kidding!! Like maybe only repeating the lies about O’Donnell once instead of every night since. Karl has slit his own throat with this. His credibility is now damaged forever. I can hardly stand to look at the guy.


148 posted on 09/18/2010 9:17:35 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

I agree with you.


149 posted on 09/18/2010 9:55:56 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tlb; All
You know what I think? I think Rove is queer.
The O’Donnell fans seem to just embrace the bile and skip the cleverness or wit altogether.


It's called efficiency, lol

And I point out once again that I clearly stated in my #18 that I had no evidence that Rove was queer, but I did compare his continuing outbursts about O'Donnell to Andrew Sullivan who sees every political issue through the prism of who or what has been thrust up his colon.

As for Karl Rove, he just needs to man up and stop carrying on like an overly estrogenic and hysterical woman.

Assuming there's enough testosterone to allow himself to do so.
150 posted on 09/18/2010 10:52:51 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: hellbender
BDS is curable, have you heard ?

Then, you won't end up as wacky as this


151 posted on 09/18/2010 11:24:47 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
What a completely inaccurate and grossly flippant characterization, as if Pres. Bush wasn’t the boss, even as he dealt with the WOT, 24/7, from 9//11 until the last day of his term, and promoted his conservative principles with a Democratic congress.

My characterization of "pushing Bush on us" was a little harsh. I was trying to be brief. Frankly, overall, I'd consider Bush to have been a little right of center, but just barely. His actions involving the war on terror were mostly, I believe, correct (though some aspects of the homeland security act are blatently unconstitutional IMHO). But, his domestic policy often drifted to the left.

He expanded Medicare drastically, brought the federal government farther into education with the "no child left behind" act, and, despite majorities on both legislative bodies, failed to make any useful changes to Social Security. I wasn't fond of his "ownership society" either, where he should have been fighting against the concept of giving deadbeats home loans instead of embracing the concept.

He favored amnesty, as did the republicans in the house and Senate (and I believe that issue alone cost them the majority). If not for the huge public outcry, we'd have had Harriet Miers put on the court.

What I'm saying is that although Bush did several conservative things while President, those were diluted by several liberal moves. You did a good job of enumerating some of the positive aspects of Bush's Presidency, but I think that we can't ignore the negative aspects as well.

152 posted on 09/19/2010 4:12:52 AM PDT by meyer (Tax the productive to carry the freeloaders - What is it with democrats and slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mobties

It should be remembered that an “R” is merely a “D” with 2 legs. At least it is when it involves RINOs.


153 posted on 09/19/2010 4:15:04 AM PDT by meyer (Tax the productive to carry the freeloaders - What is it with democrats and slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mobties
On what bases does anyone think Rove is such a political “genius”?

He took a GOP Congressional Majority and possession of the White House and turned it into a absolute political minority.

His only claim to fame is winning 2 Presidential races by the skin of his teeth and being completely wrong in his forecasting before the 2006 and 2008 elections.

Sorry but I see no evidence of any real “genius” from Rove other then that at marketing his reputation

154 posted on 09/19/2010 4:20:13 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: tlb
At least the left was making a slightly witty play on words. The O’Donnell fans seem to just embrace the bile and skip the cleverness or wit altogether

Sewer pipe meet garden hose. You might have a point except for your posting history as one the worse purveyor of mindless bile laced slanderous posting about O'Donnell.

Take the 2x4 out of your eye hypocrite. You are merely getting back what you dished out.

Your side lost this time. It happens. Get over it.

155 posted on 09/19/2010 4:30:39 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: tlb; cajungirl; eddie willers
I am curious why Rove, who started this with his slanderous post primary trash talking of O'Donnell gets a free pass from you?

You are all so upset with those defending the GOP nominated candidate for Senate in Delaware but are totally willing to ignore the conduct of the instigator of those attacks, Karl Rove

The 9-12 Project published the fact Mr Rove contacted them for the Castle campaign asking them to switch their support to Castle.

Rove was an active agent, even if unpaid, of the Castle camp.

Rove has never acknowledge that connection. He has repeatedly billed himself in his slanderous attacks on O'Donnell as “just a political analyst” giving his “objective opinion”.

That is lying by omission.

That Rove has not made full disclose of his connections to the Castle campaign indicates a clear conflict of interest and a deliberate attempt to mislead Fox News and it's viewers. In the private sector, concealing such a conflict would be consider an attempt to defraud and result in the termination of employment if not an arrest.

When you know of his connection to the Castle camp, Rove’s comments are a whole lot less credible

156 posted on 09/19/2010 4:37:54 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I am not giving Rove a “pass”. I am just not engaging in the latest FR tactic of throwing out the babies with the bathwater. And the strange thought process where everyone has to agree with me to have any credibility.

There are conservatives and ultra conservatives. No need to demand everyone toe one’s personal line or be banished.


157 posted on 09/19/2010 5:17:07 AM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

My education and highest degree is none of your business.

We don’t need to act like those we despise.


158 posted on 09/19/2010 5:20:11 AM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
I find it odd that some sections of the GOP do nothing when out side is subjected to the most hysteric bile laced defamatory rhetoric, yet immediately rear up to chastise anyone on our side who fights back against these slanderous, defamatory attacks.

I have been a loyal, even fanatical, GOP foot solider for 30 years. That ended watching Karl Rove, and the rest of the GOP Establishment, spending the last week all over TV slanderously attacking the GOP nominated candidate for Senate from Delaware.

159 posted on 09/19/2010 5:29:18 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Many conservatives were unhappy with Bush & Co's failure to respond effectively over the years he was in office.  In 2000, we were told to hold off because they won the Gore challenge.  After the 2002 election we were told to hold off because Republicans picked up seats, a rare event.  After the 2004 election we were told to hold off because Bush won reelection. 

So in 2006, when the whole Republican majority collapsed, Bush & Co. figured it was simply the will of the people and they decided to work with a Democrat congress.

No wonder the Republican activist base is no longer letting these people lead.  Rove is good at what he does but he is not the one to choose strategy and tactics. 

Just my opinion.



160 posted on 09/19/2010 5:35:16 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: the law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson