[babble-on]

The point is, candidates need to be vetted. Before you put your muscle and movement behind somebody, it’s wise to first check whether or not they have a screw loose.

[fortheDeclaration]

And she didn't run for Senator 6 years ago?

There is only ONE choice left, her or a Communist.

[Pox]

There are precious few politicians who have no skeletons in their closet. Hers will be blown out of proportion by the left due to the fact she beat a favorite RINO of theirs and also due to the belief that they are certain that she will lose to their preferred marxist opponent.

Will the MSM go after Coons in the same manner? You can guarantee they will not.

The marxists will ALWAYS hammer the conservative nominee while giving the dem a pass. That is now a fact of life and if you believe that conservatives can continually field squeaky clean candidates, I believe you are only kidding yourself.

[EverOnward]

And “vetted” means what to the elitists?

[WaterBoard]

Really, tell me what recent candidate has been vetted? Obama, Edwards?

Gone are the days when skeletons in the closet mean anything.

What matters is if you are a liberal or a conservative.

For crying out loud, Sen. Ted Kennedy killed a woman and Sen. Robert Byrd was in the KKK and they got re-elected to the Senate for decades.

[Lauren BaRecall]

The point is that the GOP should have vetted Christine in 2008 when they put her up against Biden. Hypocracy, thy name is RNC.

[garbanzo]

There really isn’t anything to vet. No politician alive would satisfy the microscopic analysis that some people expect. None. Even the ones who appear to be “clean” have simply spent enough time and money scrubbing the record.