I prefer to stay the hell out of other people’s bedrooms.
The law has nothing to do with overturning ‘due process’ rights and going into your bedroom.
It has to do with how the issue is dealt with when become public.
I don't think anyone contemplates going into anyone's bedroom. There shouldn't be any prosecution at all except where there is an unwilling witness like a neighbor or one of the perpetrators confesses. In fact, if only to protect the cowboys (there are a lot of them in Montana), I would prefer a "Don't ask, don't tell" policy for prosecution purposes.
Agreed, so long as they keep it in the bedroom and out of my face. The problem is that they refuse to do so.
“I prefer to stay the hell out of other people’s bedrooms.”
Ditto.
Same here. Would also prefer that the government stay the hell out of most rooms of our houses.
True, but what about incest—would you stay the hell out of that? The issue is far more complicated and the results of relationships is the most important issue in a state. Laws in the U.S. have got to protect the Natural Rights of everyone and having sex with anything and everything is not a natural right. It is unnatural.
If they do make homosexuality a crime, though,they would have to make fornication and adultery illegal, anything that prevents the natural rights of children to be raised by their biological parents.
Societies, become fascist, when they raise irresponsible children....and the only remedy to preventing crime and chaos is to have biological parents responsible for their biological offspring and to nurture and protect them to adulthood. The States have to protect and encourage that end result, unless they want extinction.
States are horrible at raising emotionally healthy children. Our prisons are filled with fatherless males.
The State does have the right to legislate against actions that cause death and disease and are a great cost in terms of medical costs and damage to relationships.
Homosexuality is sexist (excludes a sex which leads to second class citizenship wherever promoted like Sparta). It leads to a society that is divided, instead of united—marriage is the only thing that unites the sexes in the world and it is highly successful, unless it includes polygamy where the equality of the sexes is damaged. That system also creates 2nd class citizens or slaves. Look at islam.
It has been proven that the safest and most efficient form of government is one which elevates a one man, one woman relationship which is by far superior to any other social model. That is if societies want freedom and equality. You need responsible adults who can control their appetites, otherwise there is a need for government intervention.
To throw out reason, logic and science, is so bizarre and so selfish of homosexuals because they care about forcing societies to condone their “lust” at the expense of the physical and emotional development of young children. Really sick on more than one level.
The model that children see in their formative years is what determines their identity and actions. Homosexuality gives a model of extinction and nihilism and self-indulgence—it is NEVER inclusive of both sexes, which is so utterly sexist and exclusive! Marxism will result in a society that can’t unite.
The male/female model promotes sacrifice because of the natural differences of the sexes and it is the only way to foster the model where man learns to live with all people, not to the exclusion of men or women which denies them of their biological Natural Rights.
Any protection of the Natural Rights of the family....where a child has the right to be raised by their biological mother and father needs to be protected by our laws.
Every society that gives this special protection to homosexuals destroys and demeans the ideas that promote emotionally and physically healthy children for the future of society.
I think it is foolish to think a state does not have the right to discourage ideology which destroys the natural family—the building block of all healthy societies.
It’s a good idea to stay out of other people’s bedrooms, especially when they are destroying their families and generations ahead and behind them, as well as societies, states and nations.
More importantly, the homosexual method of thinking ostracizes them from a fellowship with God. Not that there aren’t a myriad of other methods of thinking which similarly destroy such a fellowship, namely extortion, liars, swindlers, adulterers, fornicators, murderers and a litany of others. In each of those perverted vices, one can also present rational arguments how such behavior is allowable in some twisted situation.
The only problem is that the people who lust for that thinking, are NOT just an alternate lifestyle, but they do know they can present themselves as such during their more sane controllable moments, and then let loose of their perverted inhibitions when they believe nobody will hold them accountable.
It is the same type of thinking as a mafioso thug who extorts money or murders unless he is paid money to satisfy his worldly lusts. He generally will not murder in public, because he knows he will be held accountable. In private, the most villainous rage is then loosed and murders are condoned in the name of controlling vice.
Condoning and decriminalizing illicit behavior doesn’t encourage virtue. It will greatly accelerate crime of the most heinous sort.
BTW, the intentions of those promoting homosexuality today isn’t simply to avoid others probing into their private lives. They have well announced their intentions to mold society into not only accepting homosexuality, but they desire an anathema upon heterosexuality in a couple of generations. Don’t assume criminals are the same as virtuous people,... they aren’t. Homosexuals are some of the most corrupt people living today. They’ve also have learned how to present themselves in a socially acceptable fashion so as to allow their perversions to continue unabated within their groups.
We also have not begun to quantify and qualify the large numbers of destroyed families which have never been repaired due to this criminal perversion.
I would say that the majority of Americans, as do I, agree with that sentiment. I do think that Americans have ever seen government spying on their bedrooms before. So, maybe your fear is unfounded -maybe, this is really a straw man argument?
Regardless, the problem I see is much the opposite:
How do we as a society get the practitioners of homosexual sex to keep their bedroom antics the hell out of the public domain?
For instance, why should school children be exposed to the disordered practices?
That's the attitude that allowed the sodomite movement to permeate American Institutions:
"The Buggery Blitzkrieg that started in 2003 came fast and furious. Not unlike the French of World War II, traditionalists were quickly overrun and astonished at the lightening-fast strike that came from the homosexual lobby. From Lawrence v. Texas to Gavin Newsom's weddings by the bay, traditionalists were overwhelmed by the war that was unleashed on them."
The RETURN of sodomy laws will help "chase the purveyors of sex and violence back beneath the rocks whence they came."