Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania
Can you deny that Liebermann is just about always voting with the insurance companies and for anything that helps Israel?

Can you deny that Ronald Reagan is just about always voting with the private sector and for anything that hurts the Soviet Union? Does this mean that Reagan was in the pocket of businesses and being controlled by opponents of the USSR? Or was he a man with principles, who regularly acted in a manner consistent with them?

Leibermann may be a flaming lefty on social issues (and someone I disagree with almost universally in that arena), but he has been consistent on many issues enough that I tend to believe that his stances are principled (even if he follows principles I do not hold). It even cost him his spot within the Democrat party. You've insinuated something very different...

63 posted on 09/18/2010 11:34:36 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
If for nothing else, I disagree totally with Lieberman's decision to run as an independent after he lost the primary. I'm saying that is the precedent for what we're seeing now; that would be neocon globalist losers who decide it's okay to run as independents after they lose a primary.

There really should be a law that once a candidate loses in the primary they can no longer run for that office at that time. The exception would be, of course, if the person who won the nomination in their party dropped out.

65 posted on 09/18/2010 12:35:58 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson