...”checkered financial past, her history of litigiousness and paranoia, her misleading statements about her educational background”....
None of this is true?
She has had problems but the point is Karl Rove sat there on national TV and unecessarily went into a detailed tirade about her; not on one show but 3 (possibly more). For a guy that is so detailed, why didn’t he bring out the flip side that Coons is an avowed marxist or better yet, where was he when Obama was campaigning and why didn’t he go through a whole laundry list on him?
Like David Limbaugh said last nite on Mark Levin’s show,(paraphrasing) we cannot afford to put people in that are not going to vote the right way; we are going to have less than pure candidates that may have had problems/quirks (his word).
I watched Rove when he made his first on air attack against O’Donnell. He gave a litany of her faults, some valid and some false. You know what I found most unusual? It was his ability to list so many of the Castle campaign’s talking points in such quick order. Watch it yourself. It was almost as though he was reading from a script.
In my opinion, this was a clear premeditated attack on the conservative — after she had won. So, what was Rove’s motive? Could he quickly list Coon’s or Castle’s faults the same way? Hmmmm. For someone who claims to be in favor of Republicans, he’s sure acting strangely.