http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2590103/posts
Still has absolutely nothing to do with the title: it doesn’t say where /when /how CA paid him $4.5 mil to rape kids. He didn’t want to rape them for less than $4.5 million or what?
Or maybe the sensational headline is factually wrong?
“Still has absolutely nothing to do with the title: it doesn’t say where /when /how CA paid him $4.5 mil to rape kids. He didn’t want to rape them for less than $4.5 million or what?
Or maybe the sensational headline is factually wrong?”
Okay, so you don’t like the way the thing is worded, and THAT is the only outrage you can muster over this story???
Really?