Yep, it was posted on FR two days ago.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2590103/posts
Still has absolutely nothing to do with the title: it doesn’t say where /when /how CA paid him $4.5 mil to rape kids. He didn’t want to rape them for less than $4.5 million or what?
Or maybe the sensational headline is factually wrong?