Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/17/2010 8:56:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SeekAndFind

In a demo, Microsoft showed IE9 to be at least five times quicker than Google Chrome.

They are able to increase the load speed significantly faster because of the integration between hardware and software: with the advance of new web programming language HTML5, Microsoft is now able to offload much of the burden of processing graphics onto computer hardware that’s built for the job, the graphics processing unit (GPU).

Of course Google isn’t going to sit still....

Competition is good.


2 posted on 09/17/2010 8:58:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
the first is a bid to make websites more like applications

WONDERFUL! So while MS is creating a new "revolutionary" browser, they're now using ASP and ActiveX MORE in order to "make websites more like applications." Really, MS? Ok, so you've got exploits coming out of your arse, you're patching security flaws monthly, and now you want to sell the user communities to the hacking community by making "websites more like applications?"

Sorry, I have no taste for IE anymore. If a site uses ASP or ActiveX, I just don't visit or partake in the content. I'd rather browse knowing that I have control over my kernel (I use Linux) vs. browsing and accepting any ActiveX request that comes along.

4 posted on 09/17/2010 9:02:08 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m running the beta (downloaded yesterday). I was getting the “foggy screen of death” in IE8 and could not get it solved. Since downloading the IE9 beta, I have not had one such incident. It also appears to be faster, although I have not used it enough to ascertain just how much faster.


6 posted on 09/17/2010 9:03:25 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not for me. Not after getting hammered with a virus awhile back. The tech who cleaned it for me said “Rule #1 for avoiding attacks is to use any browser EXCEPT IE.


7 posted on 09/17/2010 9:04:50 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

My favorite post of the day, so far.


10 posted on 09/17/2010 9:08:49 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN '66-'67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

11 posted on 09/17/2010 9:09:08 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hopefully it’s not as crappy as Vista


14 posted on 09/17/2010 9:16:07 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I just installed the beta, and it’s running well so far. Hopefully no crashes. Stuff is moved around a little bit, but seems really good so far.


16 posted on 09/17/2010 9:21:26 AM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No, but it is an improvement over their old browsers.


17 posted on 09/17/2010 9:24:18 AM PDT by GunningForTheBuddha ("RINOs, shoo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Irrelevant. It’s Windows-only. It’s not going to revolutionize anything.


18 posted on 09/17/2010 9:25:05 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hmmm...

Think I will stay with WebKit based browsers for now
I lost any trust in Microsoft LOOOONNNNNGGGGG time ago


19 posted on 09/17/2010 9:31:34 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Will IE9 change the way we use the web?

No, because they do not go by established standards for web browsers.


22 posted on 09/17/2010 9:41:59 AM PDT by RolandTignor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
If anybody wants to get a good idea of how browser market share has changed over time, look here:

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

IE isn't doing very well.

25 posted on 09/17/2010 9:47:11 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
OK, so I tried it.

I updated a "virgin" Win7 VM ("virgin" meaning nothing other than Windows et al ever installed on it) and tested the site BEAUTYOFTHEWEB.com.

When I click on EXPERIENCE, til the time the icons stop bouncing around was a bit less than 6 seconds, judging by my watch.

I copied the VM, and run just the copy. Then I updated the copy to IE 9 and did the same test - just a bit more than 6 seconds.

The VMs are running on VMware Fusion on my Macbook Pro. I rn the same test on Safari, and got about 4 seconds.

Now I know that a VM will run slower than a native app, so I'm not about to crow over the Safari number. But "revolutionary" ?

I think not.

30 posted on 09/17/2010 10:16:36 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

i installed ie 9 yesterday, but not fully.

i tried to uninstall ie 8 from the control panel,

but there’s no ie 8 to delete.

meanwhile, ie 9 isn’t operable: “setup cannot continue due to a more recent version of internet explorer is installed on your computer.”

how do i uninstall something not listed in the control panel?


32 posted on 09/17/2010 10:38:00 AM PDT by ken21 (who runs the gop?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I wish I could go back to 7, 8 is pure crap!

The only reason I usr 8 is I can’t access my bank account with 7!


37 posted on 09/17/2010 12:10:03 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Which of the browsers is best optimized for porn?


38 posted on 09/17/2010 12:11:12 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


39 posted on 09/17/2010 2:54:10 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; ShadowAce; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv

This is great for loggin' onto those BBSes.

I hear those 1200 baud modems are the bee's knees.

40 posted on 09/17/2010 4:27:26 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
> Almost since it launched Internet Explorer in 1995, the browser has been troublesome for Microsoft.

Clearly a typo. Should have read:

Almost since it licensed Spyglass Mosaic, a weak precursor of the Netscape browser, and re-badged it as their own in 1995, the browser has been used by Microsoft as a weapon to bludgeon, coerce, or destroy other companies and the internet/web community, despite the fact that the IE browser sucked mightily for many years and only became usable in its 7th release over a decade later*.
There, fixed it.

* Until IE7, the "About IE" box still credited Spyglass. I personally use IE as little as possible, but recognize that it has improved immeasurably in 7 and 8. I currently have no opinion on IE9, not having had a chance to try it out yet.

42 posted on 09/17/2010 6:36:02 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson