To: Kaslin; raptor22; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385; ...
RE :”
In June 2009, a New Jersey state judge decided that a man who punished his wife with pain for hours and repeatedly raped her was not guilty of criminal sexual assault, citing the man's religious beliefs. “
I had to take culture diversity sensitivity traing at work but they didn't talk about this liberal conflict in it(the white male Christians are always the oppressors in those lectures.) .
I guess my first question is: even if he can beat and rape her does she still have the right to an abortion even if he objects ? Priorities are priorities, rights are rights :)
Can they beat up homosexuals too? How do they fit in?
16 posted on
09/16/2010 8:02:01 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: sickoflibs
"In June 2009, a New Jersey state judge decided that a man who punished his wife with pain for hours and repeatedly raped her was not guilty of criminal sexual assault, citing the man's religious beliefs." I have no idea how trial judges serve in NJ - term, life whatever. But, that sentence is all anyone needs to read to know that a seat on the bench for life is a BAD, BAD idea. His stupidity really goes beyond description. He should be removed post-haste.
To: sickoflibs
>> I had to take culture diversity sensitivity training at work <<
I had to go though this as well. That’s why I no longer work for that company.
38 posted on
09/24/2010 11:48:27 AM PDT by
appalachian_dweller
(Live each day as if it's your last.....it might be.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson