No. It's also up to you to interpret what the results mean. It's been common wisdom that any poll this far in advance of an election (2+ years) is little more than a name recognition contest.
What's wrong with it, is that you are attempting to apply any special meaning to it. Most people know Newt Gingrich and memories of 1995-1996 have started to fade.
Think of Mr. Newt as the Republican lite version of Teddy Kennedy. After his swimming expedition, Kennedy was never electable as President. Still, the name held magic for people and in pre-primary seasons, he always polled very high. In 1980, against a failed Presidency, and with high preseason poll numbers in hand, he threw his hat into the ring and failed.
Mr. Newt has more name recognition than others on the list. Nothing more.
In rereading my earlier posts I noticed I may have been a little unclear with my Don’t Trust Polls remark. I don’t trust single stand alone polls. Before I allow myself to put any stock in any kind of ground swell shown in a certain poll, I want to see a basket of them over a period of time. And I do see your point on Mr. Newt, it just irks me when he keeps showing up in these polls, its a bad memory that just wont go away. The man has zero likelihood of being the pick just like Kennedy.