Posted on 09/15/2010 12:17:42 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
The US should give up its veto over important decisions in the International Monetary Fund in return for Europe accepting a smaller say, Germany has proposed.
The suggestion, which experts say will be strongly opposed by the US, addresses a politically highly symbolic dispute about voting power and seats on the fund’s executive board. Shifting power towards emerging market countries is one of the central elements in the Group of 20 nations’ drive to make the fund and other international institutions more representative.
Last month the US used a procedural manoeuvre to force the European countries to agree reforms to the executive board by November 1. The 24-member board currently has nine European executive directors, and negotiations have been under way to increase representation from emerging markets, particularly in Asia.
Since the UK, France and Germany have seats by right, this would almost certainly mean smaller European countries such as the Nordic nations, the Netherlands and Belgium giving up seats.
In a parallel process, countries are debating the voting weights or “quotas” of countries on the board.
Wolfgang Schäuble, German finance minister, suggested on Tuesday that Europe would have to accept fewer seats. “I agree that representation of developing and emerging countries at the board will have to increase over time and that other countries or regions will have to reduce their representation as their quota shares are reduced,” he told the Financial Times.
Mr Schäuble said that in return, “we should consider lowering the special voting majorities for the most important IMF decisions so that in the future we can do without a blocking minority for a single country or a very small group of countries”.
Currently important decisions require a supermajority of 85 per cent of votes, and the US has a 17 per cent share. The Bric countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – also have enough votes between them to block decisions.
Ted Truman, fellow at the Peterson Institute in Washington and formerly a senior official at the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, said the German proposal was a “constructive opening gambit”, but that the US and Bric countries would not give up their veto.
European countries collectively hold about 30 per cent of the votes on the board, meaning that a reduction of the supermajority threshold to around 75 per cent, as suggested by Germany, would still allow them to block votes. “The US will ask why it is expected to give up its own veto while Europe in effect still has one,” he said.
The US Treasury reiterated the US’s existing statement, saying it “supports reforming IMF governance structures to better reflect the realities of today’s global economy”.
Mr Schäuble said Berlin had informed other European countries of its proposal but it did not represent a common European position.
The World Bank, the IMF’s sister institution, earlier this year agreed changes to its own board to increase emerging market representation.
Sure, let’s give up the veto and pull out all support for this failure of an institution. Let the EU pour money into black holes.
How about not?
Whoever foots the bill should get the votes. Period!
As in: He who pays the piper calls the tune.
“Whoever foots the bill should get the votes. Period!”
That would be China. We’re Broke.
Sell it to the highest bidder (we need the cash).
Just because we are “broke” does not mean that we are not putting the payments on the credit card!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.