Posted on 09/13/2010 5:03:01 PM PDT by lancer256
Why did President Obama choose tolerance as the subject of his speech at the Pentagon ostensibly to commemorate the victims of 9/11? Why is it that he insists on making this the overarching point at such events rather than, say, express our deep regret for the lost lives of the murdered Americans and repeat our national resolve to "bring to justice" those behind the massacre?
Then again, we are talking about President Obama here, the man who also believes the primary lesson we should learn from the Islamists' beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl is that the freedom of press is alive and well. Speechless here.
Obama's the guy who, instead of somberly lamenting the killing of 12 soldiers and a security guard by U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood, began his remarks with a detached "shout-out" to Dr. Joe Medicine Crow, leaving the world to wonder just how warm the blood flowing through his veins is.
But it's not Obama's curiously bloodless behavior and strange disconnectedness (as British journalist Toby Harnden put it) that most concerns me about his Pentagon speech and the others. It's his reflexive instinct to lecture Americans, when they're not the ones who need lecturing.
(Excerpt) Read more at davidlimbaugh.com ...
Why?
Because he’s an arrogant, elitist, leftist douchebag.
Obama needs to lecture the Muslim world. Don’t kill Christians and Jews.
Allow churches to be built. Allow missionaries to visit your country.
Why does he lecture the extremely tolerant West and ignore the intolerance
which is part of the death cult of Islam?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOSkxG04edw&feature=related
WHEN will OBAMA take his own advice and TOLERATE DISSENT?
He’s a lying, vlle hypocrite.
He is a Muslim, or at best a Muslim sympathizer, pure and simple! He is the awaited Islamic Sun rising in the West! (in his own mind at least)
I don’t have lexis nexis but if someone can track down the reaction these leftists morons to the fatwas and death threats aimed at Rushdie for his Satanic Verses.IIRC the intellectual left was unanimous in defending Rushdie and condemning the Islamic reaction. What’s changed?
1) Tolerance/Islamophobia
2) The Great Contributions of Islam
3) Death to America/Jews
We've only heard the first two so far.
He'll get to the third one if we leave him squatting in the White House much longer.
” But it’s not Obama’s curiously bloodless behavior and strange disconnectedness (as British journalist Toby Harnden put it)
that most concerns me
about his Pentagon speech and the others.
It’s his reflexive instinct to lecture Americans, when they’re not the ones who need lecturing. “
Limbaugh’s “ Crimes Against Liberty “ is fantastic.
However, I think all of us should be concerned with Barry’s
“ curiously bloodless behavior and strange disconnectedness.”
Barry is showing increasing signs of mental instability.
This is not a desirable quality in a Commander in Chief in a tinderbox world.
Barry was missing for three hours during the Christmas Day bombing.
Bill Burton, WH spokesman issued a statement on December 25
stating that Barry
“ was told of the incident about three hours
after the plane landed.”
The New York Times gave a different and equally unbelievable version ,
although more hilarious about Barry’s
whereabouts during the attempted bombing.
“ Mr. Obama was singing Christmas carols with his family
at their secluded Hawaiian beachfront getaway
on Friday when a military aide
interrupted with news of an attempted terrorist attack aboard an American airliner, an aide said. “
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/27/us/politics/27memo.html
Lectures aside , Barry’s odd behavior in public is a window into
what must be extremely bizarre behavior in private.
And that should concern every American.
I would not expect Zero or his lefty friends and supporters to offer any other sentiment when it comes to the steady creep, creep, creep of Islam in the West. But, especially in the face of what is happening in Great Briton, France and Scandinavia, I am baffled why the people of the United States have not yet awakened to the call.
Islam is not just another religion like Christianity or Judaism. Islam, via the Koran, brings with it an entire socio-economic and political structure that is completely at odds with our Constitution.
When Zero compares building a mosque with building a church or synagogue he is knowingly turning the debate in the wrong direction. To date, nobody has taken him up on it.
Each and every time some imam wants to build a bridge and lecture us about tolerance we must turn the discussion to the Koran and Sharia Law and highlight the incompatibility of the US Constitution with anything Koranic.
Instead of building bridges in the US the GZ imam should be building bridges in Iraq and Iran and Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan and Pakistan and Syria and Egypt and Somalia and Lebanon and Gaza and .....
He’s a standard left-wing academic, but even more insecure because he never published.
He thinks that he’s going too far in trying to seem moderate. His speech is so halting and tone-deaf because he doesn’t want to give away his true feelings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.