Posted on 09/13/2010 5:23:14 AM PDT by LatinaGOP
A British teenager who sent an email to the White House calling President Obama an obscenity was banned from America for life, The Sun reported Monday.
The FBI asked local cops to tell college student Luke Angel, 17, his drunken insult was "unacceptable."
(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxdc.com ...
You are welcome if you are here illegally and they will give you amnesty, they assume you will vote Dem. HS is almost about a bad as the airport security stooges. (there are more than 3 of them)
I doubt this story is true, it just doesn’t sound credible to me.
Easy to fix! There are countless ways to win-back a welcome to the Obamanation: Burn the American flag, insult the U.S.A., convert to Islam, sneak across the border claiming the Southwest belong to Mexicans/Mexico,... Do enough of them and you may get an invite to the White House.
LOL! This reminds me of the times when I would have to come down hard on my sons because even though they spoke the truth, the way they spoke it was not right. Angry on the outside, laughing my ass of on the inside.
So, who sent the FBI out to teach the kid acceptable behavior? And since when is calling the President a bad name grounds for keeping people out of the US?
Can we expect the FBI to start visiting anyone and everyone calling the President a bad name? If the FBI is sent out to investigate a 17 year old in Great Britain who called the president a ‘prick,’ how much time, money and resources are been used to monitor what US citizens say about the President?
Unless there was something else in the email we do not know about, something that might be perceived as a threat and needed to be checked out, this borders on paranoid.
(There is always the possibility a piece is missing from the story.)
I want to see the list of 60 reasons. I have never heard of such a list. I would also like to know what number his letter violated.
The article says the letter was threatening, but unless I am missing something, I don’t see where they said what the threat was. From what I can see only the feelings of the hyper-sensitive cry baby was threatened.
I do, too.
And I'd like to know why exceptions are made for people like Tariq Ramadan and Ahmadangnutjob.
What a joke. The US cannot even identify millions of illegals in the country right now. Yet they think they can ban one person. Good luck with that.
I wonder what happens if you call him a Commie lovin Muzzie?
Can’t call the thin skinned Bozo a name but you can commit all sorts of crimes while being here illegally and you will never be banned from the USA. I don’t think we have an authority that allows banning any way except for terrorist types and other criminals.
Me either, if true it is a very serious situation for all.
You don gitit.
Is not what he he callit Him,
it is the state secret that was revealet.
Now the hole worlt nows dat and is disrispicting Amerika.
Whata shame, we are rilly skruwed, seriesly!
Long live Kenyan King! (jus tryin to get on His gud sayd)
So, you’re saying Behoe is Georgie boy’s punk?
Soooo, if I call that PW crybaby in the WH a prick, I’ll be banned from the US. Will I still have to pay income taxes?
The State Department issues visas, and they are under the direction of the President. Without a visa, you can’t enter the country. So, all it takes is the stroke of a bureaucrat’s pen to say that a certain person will never be issued a visa, for whatever reason.
Not saying it’s right, just saying that’s the way it is.
One of the reasons must be, "because it offended Obozo". That is a reason a Judge (9th Circuit) used in finding the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy unconstitutional.
What is ironic about this article, if true, is that the HS (and State Dept.) are getting their panties tied in a knot over a obviously non-credible threat to the Won who sleeps at 1600 Penn. Ave.
But the real threats would never make a public statement. There are those in this country who are capable of things that would just happen with no exposure until it was over. (Note- I wish him NO HARM. I want him removed from the White Hut in handcuffs.)
The disturbing thing in this case is that the action seems to be simply because he annoyed Obama. I’ve never seen a president get so personally involved in exercising repressive powers over average citizens (or even non-citizens, now).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.