Ayotte is a pro-choicer. NRO did a piece on Ovide, endorsing Ovide and exposing Ayotte. Ayotte represents the same DC foolishness people are fed up with.
“Ayotte is a pro-choicer. NRO did a piece on Ovide, endorsing Ovide”
Sorry, but you are wrong. This is right off Ayotte’s website. Ayotte is very prolife:
“Kelly Ayotte believes in traditional marriage and is Pro-life.
As New Hampshire’s Attorney General, Kelly aggressively fought an attempt by Planned Parenthood to challenge the New Hampshire Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. She personally appealed the case to the Supreme Court and in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England and the Court remanded the earlier ruling, saying that “States have the right to require parental involvement when a minor considers terminating her pregnancy.”
Kelly’s unmatched record on life has earned her the recent endorsements of the Susan B. Anthony List and the New Hampshire Citizens for Life , the state chapter of the National Right to Life organization.”
Sarah Palin and the Susan B. Anthony List do not endorse candidates who are proabortion.
KELLY AYOTTE IS PRO-LIFE
And as for NRO’s endorsement of Ovide, they are also pushing RIINO proabort Mike Castle in Delaware. I don’t give a hoot what NRO says or does.
I sent a contribution to Ovide today, in response to Jim DeMint’s email request. I’m not real crazy about Rand Paul, but Jim is right on with his other endorsements. We’re not all perfcet, anyway! Jim has a better track record in support of true conservatives. Nothing against Palin, as I like her lot, but I think she’s missed the mark a few times this cycle, especially in support of female candidates. I think she doesn’t always look as closely as I would to their track record.