“Ayotte is a pro-choicer. NRO did a piece on Ovide, endorsing Ovide”
Sorry, but you are wrong. This is right off Ayotte’s website. Ayotte is very prolife:
“Kelly Ayotte believes in traditional marriage and is Pro-life.
As New Hampshire’s Attorney General, Kelly aggressively fought an attempt by Planned Parenthood to challenge the New Hampshire Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. She personally appealed the case to the Supreme Court and in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England and the Court remanded the earlier ruling, saying that “States have the right to require parental involvement when a minor considers terminating her pregnancy.”
Kelly’s unmatched record on life has earned her the recent endorsements of the Susan B. Anthony List and the New Hampshire Citizens for Life , the state chapter of the National Right to Life organization.”
Sarah Palin and the Susan B. Anthony List do not endorse candidates who are proabortion.
KELLY AYOTTE IS PRO-LIFE
And as for NRO’s endorsement of Ovide, they are also pushing RIINO proabort Mike Castle in Delaware. I don’t give a hoot what NRO says or does.
Ayotte is pro-choice. Life means that, life. Ayotte believes there should be exceptions for rape, incest, and emergency. That’s the view of pro-choicers. Pro-lifers believe life begins at conception. A life is a life whether it’s conceived properly through marriage, rape or incest, anything beyond that and humans are playing God. God believes all life is sacred, “exceptions for rape, incest, and emergency” goes against that. Incest is a sin, but you don’t punish an unborn baby for the sins of the others involved.
Romney had a “conservative” sounding website too. It means NOTHING