Skip to comments.
Smoking out cigarette tax evaders
Chicago Tribune ^
| September 12, 2010
| Julie Wernau
Posted on 09/12/2010 1:34:22 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
Chicago loses an estimated $120 million a year and the U.S. billions on uncollected taxes on cigarettes. But that could change with the Sept. 2 sale of a little-known Illinois company that produces cigarette tax stamps that are used throughout the country.
States have struggled for more than a half-century to control rampant cigarette tax evasion, the result of stamp counterfeiting, cross-border smuggling, sales of unstamped products and other illegal activity.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cigarettes; cigarettetax; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Cue up "Tax Man"!
To: ConservativeStatement
Another step toward Big Brother.
2
posted on
09/12/2010 1:37:05 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
To: ConservativeStatement
I would love to see if if everyone just up and quit smoking. Oh it would be the wailing and gnasing of teeth amongst the tax pimps. THEN we would see that they don’t really give a damn about the health effects of smoking...just the tax effects.
3
posted on
09/12/2010 1:37:05 PM PDT
by
FrankR
(It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
To: ConservativeStatement
Insanity
Why tax a person’s habit?
4
posted on
09/12/2010 1:37:29 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden's new album in the top 5 in the US. Incredible)
To: ConservativeStatement
“I need to see your license, registration and cigarette pack...”
5
posted on
09/12/2010 1:37:55 PM PDT
by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: ConservativeStatement
6
posted on
09/12/2010 1:38:27 PM PDT
by
mylife
(Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
To: ConservativeStatement
Chicago loses an estimated $120 million a year and the U.S. billions on uncollected taxes on cigarettesHow can you lose what you never had?
7
posted on
09/12/2010 1:39:26 PM PDT
by
A_perfect_lady
(Instead of building a grand mosque at Ground Zero, let's build a Ground Zero at their Grand Mosque.)
To: ConservativeStatement
Wow! All that money Daley wasn’t able steal!!
To: ConservativeStatement
The commie nanny state relies on smokers for its survival. Without the money stolen from smokers by the feds, the ‘RATS commie nanny state is toast. Communism has never worked anywhere.
9
posted on
09/12/2010 1:40:42 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Don't you dare try to use MY Constitution to protect and defend MY enemies!)
To: wastedyears
Why tax a persons habit?Because it's a hard habit to break, thus a reliable source of income if they can just figure out how to enforce it.
10
posted on
09/12/2010 1:41:09 PM PDT
by
A_perfect_lady
(Instead of building a grand mosque at Ground Zero, let's build a Ground Zero at their Grand Mosque.)
To: libertarian27
What would happen if I spit some Beechnut in his eye.....
11
posted on
09/12/2010 1:44:35 PM PDT
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: ConservativeStatement
Smoke a ciggie, get taxed. Smoke some pole and get a gubmint subside.
Cigarettes are bad MmmKay...???
12
posted on
09/12/2010 1:46:12 PM PDT
by
mylife
(Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
To: FrankR
I've just gone to rolling my own, it's 1/10 th price.
13
posted on
09/12/2010 1:50:37 PM PDT
by
tired1
(When the Devil eats you there's only one way out.)
To: ConservativeStatement
Chicago loses an estimated $120 million a year Stop right there. You are not "entitled" to it.
14
posted on
09/12/2010 1:51:00 PM PDT
by
doodad
To: A_perfect_lady
and why they don’t outlaw it.
15
posted on
09/12/2010 1:52:44 PM PDT
by
doodad
To: ConservativeStatement
Every time the federal government mentions a new tax, it should start up the debate about repealing the 16th Amendment, the Income Tax, and replacing it with a simple, single tax, that outside of international tariffs, would be the federal government’s sole source of income.
With very strict controls on the ability of the federal government to issue bonds or other debt.
No exemptions, no fees, no licenses, no “sin taxes”, no VAT, no withholding, no other source of money for the federal government.
Since the individual States do much of the what the federal government demands of them, they should get the money to do it with directly. And if they don’t want to do it, then their senators should stand against it.
And I mean “their” senators, which means the repeal of the 17th Amendment, the Direct Election of Senators, which was a sneaky, faux democratic way, of preventing the States from protecting their citizens, from the federal government.
To: ConservativeStatement
What a junk article. Supposedly Chicago is not getting to tax 75% of the cigarettes smoked in the city, but this technology does nothing to fix it. They know if retailers or individuals are now paying the city tax by the presence or absence of the city tax stamp. In this system, to check this simple thing would require an 800 dollar scanner, which only enforces at the retailer level.
More pimping of foreign companies with technology that actually goes backwards, making it harder on the city to enforce taxes that I think are unconstitutional.
17
posted on
09/12/2010 1:59:55 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
To: tired1
Me too!
I also grew three plants this year as an experiment.
It was easy and they’re terrific. Not even cured really, just dried!
Next year ten plants!
18
posted on
09/12/2010 2:01:58 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: ConservativeStatement
Chicago loses an estimated $120 million a year and the U.S. billions on uncollected taxes on cigarettes.Chicago smokers keep 120 million more of their hard earned labor.
19
posted on
09/12/2010 2:04:27 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: wastedyears
Why tax a persons habit?A socialist:
Because it's there and we can.
20
posted on
09/12/2010 2:06:25 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson