Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roses of sharon
Why even use that language..."tax cuts for the rich"?

Lame *ss using Dem talking points!

22 posted on 09/12/2010 8:34:06 AM PDT by CAluvdubya ("Sarah Palin fights, we cannot spare her."--GonzoGOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CAluvdubya

well spotted

what is it with the GOP and some on the right when they play the lefts word game.
they say public option and we should saying Govt take over but we say what they want us to say.
here’s some others
gay but we should say homosexual
they say back to work bill we should be saying stimulus
tax cuts for the rich we should be saying tax cuts for everyone and for those which will make jobs

when we play the lefts word game then we play by their rules and they set the tone of the debate right away.

they’re not stupid when it comes to this but many on the right are.


37 posted on 09/12/2010 8:40:45 AM PDT by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: CAluvdubya
Every time some liberal says they are against “tax cuts for the rich” we need to say... you mean you are against tax cuts for employers? because that's who the rich are, the people that EMPLOY people! So when you oppose tax cuts for employers, what you are really saying is, that you are happy with the current unemployment rate. Because contrary to liberal opinion the vast majority of the rich are not like Paris Hilton or John Kerry living off the wealth of their productive parents or rich wives fortunes, they are the business owners who employ people.
105 posted on 09/12/2010 9:36:56 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson