Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Boehner Offers Concession on Tax Cuts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2586035/posts

1 posted on 09/12/2010 8:24:12 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: roses of sharon

How many times do we have to tell this buffoon that the focus needs to be upon growth?? Stop getting caught in the Dem’s trap...


23 posted on 09/12/2010 8:34:07 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
I didn't like this position, but I believe this is a poker chip that the left has just lost.

This has taken the wind out of "it's all the Republican's fault" we keep getting from our whiny Princess President.

The game is just starting. Can the house and senate pass an extension quickly? I'm thinking that there's a lot of slippage between now and Nov that will keep it from passing.

GOP--LET THE CUTS EXPIRE AND LET PEOPLE GET JANUARY PAYCHECKS.

Then issue a retroactive extension. It will teach people a lot--particularly when Obama tries to stop it.

24 posted on 09/12/2010 8:35:00 AM PDT by Mamzelle (Cameras, cameras--never forget to bring your cameras)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Jeeeez, I flippin give up....


25 posted on 09/12/2010 8:35:26 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (I'd rather take my chances with someone misusing freedom than someone misusing power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Tax cuts are meaningless without spending cuts.


26 posted on 09/12/2010 8:35:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans would cost $700 billion over the next decade.

I know it is cBS news, but this still angers me. The slant in this article gives the impression that the government is doling out money to rich folks (and therefore depriving the "needy"...blah blah). Tax cuts don't "cost" the government anything. They prevent the government from confiscating larger portions of taxpayer earnings. Tell this to a liberal, watch their brain melt and leak out of their ears.
27 posted on 09/12/2010 8:36:14 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

So what is the income for ‘rich’ folks in America now? Anyone making over $100,000 a year??

Goodbye, small businesses that make up the backbone of the American economy! You all are too RICH to save us now!

“Share the wealth” and Obamazation of ALL industries, here we come!!


30 posted on 09/12/2010 8:37:58 AM PDT by pillut48 (Whenever O says, "Let me be clear," you know what is to follow is a bunch of nuanced BS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

The political timing from the Democrats is shady. They’re offering a some but not all offer on tax cuts, so they can divide Republicans and conservatives before midterms and make the GOP look like Republicans doesn’t want to cut taxes.

Ideally, conservatives want everyone to get tax cuts, but Dems will use that to say conservatives / GOP are holding up the bill b/c the GOP doesn’t want tax cuts...for the middle class, knowing very well that many Republicans view tax cuts from Reagan’s “trickle down” economy.

Dems know this is their last chance to pull such a stunt before new members are sworn in come January.


31 posted on 09/12/2010 8:38:33 AM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
"they would have us borrow $700 billion over the next 10 years to give a tax cut of about $100,000 each to folks who are already millionaires."

Well, if this tax increase goes through, the ONLY jobs that will be created for the next decade will be government jobs.

If I had 1m dollars and had to pay the government $100,000 just for having it, I sure as hell "ain't" going to spend any more to create more wealth just to give THAT away to the government too.....I'm going to sit on my money until this tyrannical government gets out of my face before I go on with business.

32 posted on 09/12/2010 8:38:43 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Ever notice how no one in the Progressive Fascist Democrat political/media machine every question how the $13.4 trillion in new spending 0 and the Democrat Congress have given us is going to be paid for?


33 posted on 09/12/2010 8:39:08 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

That’s Newt’s boy! Will Newt stand by him like he did Scuzzy?

I say we issue another NY 23rd lesson to these dolts. Keep this dud out of the Speaker’s chair!


34 posted on 09/12/2010 8:39:08 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

The fact that he’s even discussing anything “for the rich” means he’s on the wrong side of this discussion. We’re not marxists. We don’t play the “us vs. them” and “one side can’t gain unless the other side loses” games.


35 posted on 09/12/2010 8:39:08 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility ("In a time of universal deciet, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans would cost $700 billion over the next decade.

I love the way they phrase this. Either way it "costs". It is just a question of cost to whom.

36 posted on 09/12/2010 8:40:38 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

We need to run republicans out of town, too. Wouldn’t it be great if we saw a tea party candidate elected speaker?


42 posted on 09/12/2010 8:41:32 AM PDT by gotribe (Got no use for muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

What spin and baloney,
That’s not what the man said!
He said there is no current bill language, and before he watched the economy slip further, he would consider passing what he could.


43 posted on 09/12/2010 8:42:06 AM PDT by swamprebel ("gather your armies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
John Boehner

Was chosen by Axelrod for a reason.

He must be a RINO who is easy to rol.


44 posted on 09/12/2010 8:42:41 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
Get rid of welfare. No more free rent for able bodies. No more free food, free clothes, free cell phones, free cable, etc. There's no reason why the young can't get their own jobs. That would not only bring in tax revenue to pay off the deficit, it would also cut the tax burden of all Americans in half.

It's the freebies in exchange for a vote that are destroying us. Get rid of the "free" stuff. If these people are going to WANT, let them WANT their own jobs to get it!

Why is everyone talking about what to do to the tax payers when the real issue is what to do with the extremely expensive freeloaders! They're living a very comfortable, care free life on everyone elses dime. That's why the tax payers are broke. That's why the government is broke. The only people not broke are the freeloaders!

46 posted on 09/12/2010 8:43:13 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

The bugle sound of retreat


47 posted on 09/12/2010 8:43:29 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

I wish he would stop negotiating with himself.

He could at least wait until after the election to start retreating.


50 posted on 09/12/2010 8:45:23 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The extravagance of his hype is matched by the inadequacy of his performance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon

Maybe we can drop Boehner if we have to.


51 posted on 09/12/2010 8:46:55 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated extending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans would cost $700 billion over the next decade.

That's a big fat negative, CBO. It only "costs" you something if it is money you have earned. They haven't.....it's confiscated wealth.

Besides, what's $700 B over the next decade compared to the entitlement programs accumulated costs over the same time? I'm betting the $700 B is infinitesimal in comparison.

52 posted on 09/12/2010 8:47:01 AM PDT by edpc (It's Kräusened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson