Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roses of sharon

The fact that he’s even discussing anything “for the rich” means he’s on the wrong side of this discussion. We’re not marxists. We don’t play the “us vs. them” and “one side can’t gain unless the other side loses” games.


35 posted on 09/12/2010 8:39:08 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility ("In a time of universal deciet, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Personal Responsibility

We will “pay for it” by defunding as much of the $13.4 trillion in new spending Obama and the Democrat Congress created in the last 2 years as we need to.


38 posted on 09/12/2010 8:40:48 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Personal Responsibility; Old Retired Army Guy
The fact that he’s even discussing anything “for the rich” means he’s on the wrong side of this discussion. We’re not marxists. We don’t play the “us vs. them” and “one side can’t gain unless the other side loses” games.

That's the thing, and why Boehner is an idiot despite ORAG's analysis.

Republicans need to stop running with the Democrat's false premise of who "the rich" is. When Democrats talk about the rich, they are talking about high-income wage earners who have made it on their own. They are not talking about trust fund babies who inherited their wealth and can shield it from the government.

I wish Republicans would start defending the rich. There's nothing wrong with being rich in America.

118 posted on 09/12/2010 10:01:44 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Mexico is the U.S. version of Hamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson