Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: existtoexcel

If he was tested by an independent lab then I would agree that he did not smoke pot.


79 posted on 09/11/2010 10:34:13 AM PDT by GrannyAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: GrannyAnn
If he was tested by an independent lab then I would agree that he did not smoke pot.

The surviving parent was required to have him tested within two hours.

It's in the article.

I'm sure she did it at lab she owns and controls, aren't you?

83 posted on 09/11/2010 10:41:15 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 595 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: GrannyAnn
If the school thinks he did drugs, then it is their responsibility to prove it. I suppose they could have asked the parent for permission to take a test under their controlled environment, but chose not to and left it up to the parent instead. I guess administering drug tests isn't in their union contract.

The inability or unwillingness of the school to prove it's thesis should not reflect poorly on the kid.

97 posted on 09/11/2010 10:14:19 PM PDT by Cu Roi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson