Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOE giving $575 million in carbon capture grants
Sac. Bee ^ | 9/7/10 | FREDERIC J. FROMMER

Posted on 09/07/2010 5:33:17 PM PDT by Nachum

WASHINGTON - The Energy Department said Tuesday it was awarding $575 million for carbon capture research-and-development projects in 15 states. The experimental technique involves storing carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants and other sources underground, in an attempt to reduce pollution blamed for contributing to global warming. "This is a major step forward in the fight to reduce carbon emissions from industrial plants," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu. "These new technologies will not only help fight climate change, they will create jobs now and help position the United States to lead the world in clean coal technologies, which will only increase in demand in the years ahead."

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capture; carbon; carboncapture; carboncredits; dncconspiracy; doe; fanniemae; grants; patent6904336
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Nachum

;o)


21 posted on 09/07/2010 6:00:14 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Algore is a politician and a con artist. He is NOT a scientist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

China curb on metal exports (environmental rules give China 97% rare earth mineral)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2584107/posts
America National security is at risk because of tough US environmental rules


22 posted on 09/07/2010 6:03:33 PM PDT by goldendays (that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
How do we get to the place where we are spending billions of dollars capturing one of the most abundant compound on the planet?
23 posted on 09/07/2010 6:03:59 PM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Laughable


24 posted on 09/07/2010 6:06:59 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate

So they’re going to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to pump the air we breathe into the dirt?!?


Yes.


25 posted on 09/07/2010 6:07:47 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Trying to turn junk science into real science by adding dollars...


26 posted on 09/07/2010 6:25:20 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate

plant life everywhere will be seriously ticked off when they find out.


27 posted on 09/07/2010 6:28:06 PM PDT by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
That sound of a flushing toilet is where tax dollars are going...

Need to fire (get rid of) even more CongressCritters in November...

28 posted on 09/07/2010 6:43:17 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It must be because the American taxpayers are so rich


29 posted on 09/07/2010 6:53:38 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The real potential problem is that some republican thinks he has some company that could use a protion of this money. That was the problem for all the Delay Hasstert etc etc republicans - they voted for their friends companies to get gov money!!


30 posted on 09/07/2010 6:55:47 PM PDT by q_an_a (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
This was never about fixing a real problem, for gosh sakes!   This has always been about finding nefarious ways to take money from those they don't like to be able to give it to those they do--including themselves, of course. Toward that end, it's been a raving success.

HF

31 posted on 09/07/2010 7:28:07 PM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This reminds me of farting in the bathtub as a kid and trying to keep the bubbles from escaping.


32 posted on 09/07/2010 7:46:27 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“.....The experimental technique involves storing carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants and other sources underground.....”

The Leftists are like a broken record repeating over and over again the same stupid lines. They take this “technique” from one of their oldest, and most favorite tricks of sweeping their dirt under the rug. The result will be the usual. The dirt is under the rug, and we are supposedly so stupid we don’t know the dirt is under the rug.

They are so clever.


33 posted on 09/07/2010 8:37:59 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

34 posted on 09/07/2010 9:08:48 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Part of that 9.5% that's really more like 20%, Let's call it what it is: The Great O-pression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: rdl6989; livius; DollyCali; IrishCatholic; meyer; SteamShovel; Desdemona; grey_whiskers; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

36 posted on 09/08/2010 3:43:53 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("Release the Second Chakra !!!!!!!" ... Al Gore, 10/24/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotSoModerate

Because they have to sequester two oxygen atoms for every carbon atom, permanently removing oxygen from the biosphere, it should more correctly be called oxygen capture.


37 posted on 09/08/2010 3:53:51 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

Even the design is nuts. The carbon dioxide isn’t even going into the Stomata!


38 posted on 09/08/2010 4:05:45 AM PDT by Soothesayer (“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Perhaps if they were really thinking, they might make a run of CO2 fire extinguishers?


39 posted on 09/08/2010 7:22:32 AM PDT by yesca ("..don't touch that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
storing carbon dioxide emissions from coal plants...in an attempt to reduce pollution blamed for contributing to global warming

CO2 is NOT pollution

This is an absolute waste of money.

It is an experiment that could have unintended consequences in the future. At some point in the future, there will be some of this CO2 that makes it back out of the reservoirs. Who will be the legal fall guy?

Besides, nobody has proven man is causing climate change. Even the believers say anything man can (they say should) do will have no effect.

Why waste the money?

40 posted on 09/08/2010 7:35:11 AM PDT by SteamShovel (UTOPIA...Isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson