Both the Commander-In-Chief and a General in charge of a war have called for Americans to stifle their First Amendment rights.
What do they think will happen if we actually do give up all our rights because of violent muslims?
Will we be safer?
Will they stop trying to kill infidels?
Will they cease jihad?
Will they begin to tolerate non-muslims in any way?
No.
Benjamin Franklin had it right. This is a perfect example.
Don’t ever give up your rights for some false promise of security. Ever. You’ll end up losing both your security and your freedom.
Burn ‘em.
Remember that one?
Normally I wouldn't have considered any such silly protest but the general's comments have the effect of throwing down the gauntlet. Are we free or not?
Our forefathers saw this coming, we see the results by ignoring their advice and now we have a Muslim as POTUS.
And said POTUS has its top commander complaining that his troops are in danger, the irony of this is astounding.
Burning the Koran exposes all the lies and weaknesses of Muslims, its like a truth serum and is an absolute tactical advantage, sure it appears childish but when dealing with a anal backward cult it is an act that while considered immature in the modern world is a very good act of defiance against them.
Its called defiance, we defy Islam, plain and simple as that.
We will burn the Koran, we will throw it in a cesspool, we will use its paper to clean excrement, we defy its purpose.
We defy Islam and its symbols of oppression and submission.
What rights do you forsake to be prudent? It is your right to throw gasoline on the campfire, but you might encounter advice to the contrary.
How did it become your right to provoke anger on a battlefield on which you do not sit?