Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
A few years ago, some posters took over the argument and ran everyone who disgreed with them off the threads and the site. Then the owner came out and agreed with them with his declaration against "homosexualism." Many good conservative people have been banned or left because if they disagreed with any one point, they were called pro-agenda, anti-FR, and worse. We lost a lot of discussion when that happened. But that's the way it is September 6, 2010..............
What a very interesting “take” you have on the subject. I wish what you said was the truth. I do. But I have direct and first hand knowledge that it is the opposite. Oh, you are right, in that honest and direct debate on this matter has been ended. But you wouldn’t likely believe that the end has come at the cost of Homosexual victory. When evil and good are BOTH restrained. Only evil prevails. For evil will NOT BE restrained.
Let me put that in lessor terms, since many will be blinded as not see what I am saying.
If you outlaw guns....?? Everyone can finish this one yes? We all agree on how this logic works? Only outlaws will have guns? Right?
So...
Follow me know... same trick... different pony.
If you outlaw free debate on THIS topic, then only the outlaws will win the debate. Because they will STILL push their agenda and we will not be able to push bad HARDER or HARD ENOUGH to stop it.
We are now fighting this war on this forum under “rules of engagement” and will NOT prevail because of it. Oh, we will be politer. We will be “kinder and gentler”. But we will LOSE.
So my FRiend, (Whence911)... you are right... but for all the wrong reasons, and to the very uttermost wrong conclusion.
A few years ago, some posters took over the argument and ran everyone who disgreed with them off the threads and the site. Then the owner came out and agreed with them with his declaration against "homosexualism." Many good conservative people have been banned or left because if they disagreed with any one point, they were called pro-agenda, anti-FR, and worse. We lost a lot of discussion when that happened. But that's the way it is September 6, 2010..............
whence911
Since Apr 27, 2010
From a web search got Arizona immigration bill stories here. Liked what I saw and signed up. More as I learn the ropes. I chose my name to say that we are forgettintg the lessons of 9/11 and are in danger of being too slack with the fanatics because the president wants to hold hands.
*****************************
Your home page does not agree with your post.
Really troll? When was it that Free Republic "debated" the validity of the far left agenda.
A few years ago, some posters took over the argument and ran everyone who disgreed with them off the threads and the site.
Hey troll, you joined FOUR MONTHS AGO. What are you previous names here?
Then the owner came out and agreed with them with his declaration against "homosexualism."
Are you trying to suggest that Jim once SUPPORTED the homosexual agenda?
Many good conservative people have been banned or left because if they disagreed with any one point, they were called pro-agenda, anti-FR, and worse.
Name one.
This noob knows an awful lot about FR’s past.
I wonder how......
IBTZ
Statement by the founder of Free Republic March 22, 2004
I posted the following statement to our front page in response to the criticism I'm receiving lately as to not being fair and balanced and perceived mistreatment of trolls and assorted malcontents. Got news for all, I'm NOT fair and balanced. I'm biased toward God, country, family, liberty and freedom and against liberalism, socialism, anarchism, wackoism, global balonyism and any other form of tyranny. Hope this helps.
From a web search got Arizona immigration bill stories here. Liked what I saw and signed up.
More as I learn the ropes. I chose my name to say that we are forgettintg the lessons of 9/11 and are in danger of being too slack with the fanatics because the president wants to hold hands.
Immigration bill controversy has just been within the last few months
From this post:
There was a time on the FR when such a thread would bring out argument and ongoing debate. No more. It's just a cue for everyone to come out and agree.
A few years ago, some posters took over the argument and ran everyone who disgreed with them off the threads and the site. Then the owner came out and agreed with them with his declaration against "homosexualism." Many good conservative people have been banned or left because if they disagreed with any one point, they were called pro-agenda, anti-FR, and worse. We lost a lot of discussion when that happened. But that's the way it is September 6, 2010..............
Perhaps the noob could explain how he's so familiar with FR's history when he claims he just found the website do to a recent controversy.
Oops, you slipped.....
zot
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
To be added or removed from the VK list, FReepmail Darkwing104.
Bye, troll.
and that time was when exactly?
Conservatives have always advocated that marriage is between one man and one woman.
It really is that simple and if you want them to marry then you are helping them in their agenda plus advocating any kind of marriage no matter what crap one exposes like well In know one and they just want to be left alone
The homosexual agenda has made a lot of progress in the last ten years.
I guess you don’t mind that, or what is your point?
BS. I’ve been arguing against the homosexual agenda since my first day here in 2002 and the management hasn’t changed one iota.
There’s nothing to discuss.
You scared me for a minute, comrade. I feared you might name some of the unpersons!
You have to admit their loss, and the putative impoverishment of conservative debate, has been a small price to pay for the glorious freedom of correct thought! [Stultis sips his "Victory" gin]
Reddy would have the homosexuals just mind their own business, not going around changing the definitions of words to suit what they wish them to be. He is in agreement with the rest of the country (not just FR), everywhere they have been asked.
Nope, but you did. ZOT!!
Exactly.