Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delaware Republicans Attack Tea Party Senate Candidate As Unelectable ‘Liar’
One News Now ^ | 9/3/2010 | Philip Elliot

Posted on 09/05/2010 5:28:15 AM PDT by IbJensen

Washington (AP) - Delaware Republicans call Senate hopeful Christine O'Donnell a liar who "could not be elected dog catcher" in a fierce attack that underscores GOP fears of the tea party-backed candidate knocking off top recruit Rep. Mike Castle and winning the nomination.

Stunned by tea partier Joe Miller's upset of Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Republicans are taking no chances in Delaware, which holds its primary Sept. 14. The party sees Castle, the state's lone congressman since 1993, as the best candidate for the seat long held by Vice President Joe Biden.

Republicans circulated audio of a testy, 22-minute interview that O'Donnell had with radio station WGMD on Thursday. Party officials also have said she inflated her resume and made flat-out untrue statements while being dogged by questions about tax liens and foreclosures. Castle says she has misrepresented his record.

"She's not a viable candidate for any office in the state of Delaware," state Republicann Party Chairman Tom Ross, who is backing Castle, said in a telephone interview. "She could not be elected dog catcher."

Castle's campaign began running radio ads on Thursday and prepared negative television ads against O'Donnell. The radio ads cite a News Journal of Wilmington, Del., report on O'Donnell's finances and declares her "a financial nightmare."

"According to the News Journal, O'Donnell has become a professional candidate, living off contributions from her two failed campaigns," ...

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: castle4capandtax; castle4obama; castle4romney; castle4seiu; dirtytrickshere; obama4castle; rinos4castle; romney4castle; seiu4castle; youknowwho
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: muawiyah
It has not been demonstrably the case in recent years that a purely “moderate candidate” can be elected anywhere!

Scott Brown comes to mind, although there is really no such thing as a "purely" moderate candidate (just as there is no such thing as a "purely" conservative candidate).

I assume it takes a certain amount of political courage for a candidate in DE to even call themselves a Republican. In this case, we are talking about a seat held by Joe Biden for 36 years.

61 posted on 09/05/2010 7:18:27 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The Republican Party has become almost as exasperating as The DemocRAT.

These liberal pansies posture around the floors of Congress like they belong to an exclusive club where fraternizing and crawling into bed with the opposition is just fine.

If Republicans are truly conservative and love their country they would have stood on their desks in demonstration against the latest additions to the SC. Instead we have to read the inane comments of people like Hatch extolling the virtues of these lousy candidates.


62 posted on 09/05/2010 7:19:46 AM PDT by IbJensen ((Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Dear Race, please do not take this as a personal attack against you.....
You’re a Flippin’ knee pad loving Rino.
Phew... I hope that wasn’t misunderstood...


63 posted on 09/05/2010 7:21:26 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Oh brother! Go ahead keep on electing “moderates” and see what happens. There’s just no getting through to some of you rino coddlers. Watch what happens with Scott Brown, of course he’s going to be replaced by a dem because why elect a rino when you can elect a full fledged liberal? If Repubs win this November I’ll venture to state Scott Brown will turn on more major issues with the dems than with the repubs. Which hurts repubs. Why don’t you get that??


64 posted on 09/05/2010 7:42:35 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Which hurts repubs. Why don’t you get that??

A Democrat will vote against Repubs and conservatives EVERY SINGLE TIME. That hurts worse! If Repubs don't get a numerical majority, it doesn't matter anyway!

How frickin hard is that to understand???

Better a RINO coddler than an Obama enabler IMHO!!!!

65 posted on 09/05/2010 8:20:41 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

>>Look, this other Senator they had out there was the least noticed member of the Senate in the history of the Republic.<<

You must be be referreing to the Marcel Marceau clone, Tommy “I Don’t Read No Bills” Carper. Of course, when you are the junior Senator to Old Joe Biden, when DO you get a chance to talk?

Delaware is the poster state for limiting voting rights.


66 posted on 09/05/2010 8:24:48 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Joe Biden is the reason the Democrat credit card reform bill did nothing about INTEREST RATES.

99% of the stuff in that bill was designed to transfer operating costs from the merchants to the current debtors.

After all, if customers aren't buying then there are no new purchases from merchants to generate those 4.5% charges.

Biden saved the credit card companies. Delaware's second industry is composed of nothing but credit card fulfillment operations. They employ tens of thousands of people.

67 posted on 09/05/2010 8:24:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth; A.Hun
Look, you need to look beyond the question of how a given Senator votes on a given issue to the question of who decides what gets voted on.

Harry Reid decides. If you don't like that you have to take control of the Senate. You do that by getting your guys elected. Unless you do that you'll have nothing but Harry Reid's issues to vote on.

A properly controlled legislative agenda will give even Democrats a good ACA rating!

68 posted on 09/05/2010 8:27:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
Sorry, Richard Nixon was not a RINO.

He was a NE Republican (remembering that he ran from New York, not California at the time, and all his buddies were there).

Again, the Republican party is a coalition. Not everybody can be from Texas (nor would they want be ~ gaaack, hairball).

Politicians do what they can to get elected everywhere.

69 posted on 09/05/2010 8:30:55 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I understand why DE voted for Biden...SC kept Fritz Hollings in the Senate for decades...for the same reason.

He delivered jobs.

THat doesn’t change the fact that with the correct Repub candidate, we can take that seat out of the Dem’s column, helping the conservative cause.

If it means getting a moderate Republican in exchange, so be it. The OP points out that the State Repub chairman is claiming O’Donnell couldn’t get elected to dog catcher and gives reasons why.

Many of the posters here don’t care, and prefer the seat to stay in Dem hands because Castle isn’t conservative enough.

I consider it idiocy. They also can’t make up their minds whether national Repubs should intervene or not in local and state politics. Apparently its ok if the candidate is tea party approved, but not ok if they aren’t.


70 posted on 09/05/2010 8:49:59 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Harry Reid decides. If you don't like that you have to take control of the Senate. You do that by getting your guys elected. Unless you do that you'll have nothing but Harry Reid's issues to vote on.

That is entirely too much common sense to be posted on a thread like this. ;)

71 posted on 09/05/2010 8:51:27 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
The difference between a "Moderate Republican" and a RINO is that the RINO knows why he's in office and how he has to vote ~ and that means NO JEFFORD'S TRICK where you end up caucusing with the Democrats.

If a RINO gives us legislative control he's useful. If Moderate gives us legislative control, he'll jump out of his skin every time you give him a chance to take it away ~ think of the Gang of 7 who voted with the Democrats for so long. They were all Moderates. The former Democrat Senators who jumped to the Republican party when Gingrich and company took over the House never abandoned the caucus, but the Moderates did.

I think a good number of people on this (and other threads) misrepresent the RINO as a "moderate" ~ which simply isn't true. A RINO is primarily a party label jumper. A Moderate is, of course, a traitor to the Republic.

72 posted on 09/05/2010 8:56:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Let's put it this way, "NO REACHAROUNDS". Alas that's what too many would-be "moderates" think it's all about. At least with the RINOs they know they abandoned their Democrat friends ~ who rightly don't trust them when it comes to moving legislation through Congress.

McCain got involved in too much of that "reacharound" stuff, and so did Bush. We didn't elect any of those guys to "reacharound".

73 posted on 09/05/2010 8:59:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Now, let’s go jump on that new thread that just went up advising us that “Plouffe” has something to say about Republicans ~ what a puke that guy is.


74 posted on 09/05/2010 9:00:51 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
A RINO is primarily a party label jumper.

Nope...nearly everyone in the Republican party has been labeled a RINO here for moderate views that guide their votes.

BTW, Jefford by definition isn't a RINO...he went Independent. He's more of just a POS liberal.

PS..I've got a RINO guideline if you want to see it.

A Moderate is, of course, a traitor to the Republic.

Not hardly, especially compared to the far left traitors we have in control now.

75 posted on 09/05/2010 9:07:19 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
what a puke that guy is.

No argument here...

76 posted on 09/05/2010 9:10:05 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

To 5 - Your assessment is 100pc accurate.


77 posted on 09/05/2010 9:14:52 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun
Jeffords CAUCUSED with the Democrats. In Congress if you want to participate you have to caucus with a group large enough to command some degree of attention. That means the Democrats or the Republicans, there being no Independent caucus.

Moderate views, if there can be such things, don't make you a RINO. All moderates are traitors, as are the traitors ~ they are also traitors.

The Republican party has used RINOs for over a century. These people have traditionally been Democrats who couldn't beat the leading Democrat in a primary (due to machine politics, vote fraud, relative popularity, etc.) Republicans would not usually win in those districts but if they made that #2 Democrat an offer to run as a Republican (and agree to caucus with the Republicans), the Republican vote, plus part of the Democrat vote would frequently put the guy in office and give the Republicans legislative control!

The term has always had to do with partisan politics, not ideology. Conservative, Liberal, etc. are ideological terms with clearly understood meanings.

78 posted on 09/05/2010 9:19:40 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I see your point and find it correct in regard to the big picture, but there is this little thing called: Principle.

This is more of a spiritual battle these days than a political one.

Winning for the sake of winning doesn't mean shinola unless principles are upheld.

79 posted on 09/05/2010 9:26:51 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Moderate views, if there can be such things, don't make you a RINO.

That might have been true at one time, but the term RINO is applied daily to Repubs that have never left the Repub ranch, that simply hold beliefs that aren't "conservative".

Mitch McConnell is an example, widely reviled as a RINO, but staunchly Republican. There are many others...

80 posted on 09/05/2010 9:45:54 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson