You sound like you're motivated to shadow box with yourself, as it there is a chip on your shoulder that you're busy provoking some shadows to knock off.
Other than that you come across as a wannabe law student, maybe a paralegal or some person that has some brush of experience with the court system, and you're trying to see if your words look serious when in fact the thought process is sophomoric at best.
Of course any legal scholar at just about any level of study should know that a court cannot remove a President from office, that only Congress can do so.
But you miss the big picture. Any evidence compelled and admitted in court can be used and should be used by Congress to do their duty under the Constitution, i.e. a court's discovery and actions can certainly lead to impeachment.
Spare the silly insults, okay?
Any evidence compelled and admitted in court can be used and should be used by Congress to do their duty under the Constitution, i.e. a court's discovery and actions can certainly lead to impeachment.
I disagree. The case deals only with refusal to obey a lawful order.
The courts are not an investigative arm of Congress. If the House next year thinks as I do that Hussein if of foreign birth, then Congress can and should investigate. Our civilian courts are way too political as it is and I do not wish to see military courts go that way as well.
LTC Lakin chose a self destructive avenue to vent his doubts. The military courts are not going to do the job of Congress.
If Obama is not a natural born citizen, then he has failed to qualify for the position and would NOT be president. He would, though, be a criminal for having defrauded millions of Americans out of millions of donation dollars.
How is it possible to impeach someone who is not president?