Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Pig

While I agree with your analysis, it does seem to me that a member of the military should have the right to challenge a superior (officer in effect), if something that officer has done makes him ineligible to conduct his duties.

On board a ship there are rules to go by, that make it possible for subordinates to take control of the ship from the captain, legally.

Why is there no way for an enlisted man to demand proof that the CIC is qualified to be the CIC.

In most instances I would say, Congress having reviewed the matter, the subordinate should honor it’s ruling. That is clearly not the case here. Congress has neglected it’s duty, and it rests on the shoulders of others to determine the truth of this, in it’s glaring absence.

This challenge having been made, this man deserves a hearing on the matter. Evidence and witnesses are legitimate things for this member of the service to demand access to.

This man is not seeking to remove the president. He is merely seeking proof that he is qualified to be president, and thus legitimately authorized to act as CIC. A mere coronation or oath of office DOES NOT confirm this.

If this was Nixon, they would already have the birth certificate in triplicate, and every other shred of paper generated during his lifetime, and his family members back to ten years before they entered this nation.

What are these judges so damned afraid of?


15 posted on 09/04/2010 10:19:28 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne; All
If this was Nixon they would already have the birth certificate in triplicate....

Agreed.

That is however if you believe that there even exists any written proof anywhere in the world of who this clown is. I don't.

His handlers have covered his ass waaay too good to leave anything incriminating at all around that can expose who this Manchurian really is,IMHO.

I think the only proof we will ever get is to accidentally interview the right person at the right time and possibly get the truth.

That could happen. The minute we do that person's life will be in jeopardy, IMHO. We are up against a regime that is well financed, has unlimited capability to do almost anything they need to do and is completely fearless when it comes to destroying anything we respect such as the law,love of country,the economy, you name it.

136 posted on 09/04/2010 5:26:03 PM PDT by rodguy911 ( Sarah 2012!!! Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
"If this was Nixon, they would already have the birth certificate in triplicate, and every other shred of paper generated during his lifetime, and his family members back to ten years before they entered this nation."

Not if it had nothing to do with the case, they wouldn't. But you are free to make as many copies as you like.

Photobucket

137 posted on 09/04/2010 5:29:28 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
While I agree with your analysis, it does seem to me that a member of the military should have the right to challenge a superior (officer in effect), if something that officer has done makes him ineligible to conduct his duties.

In other words, you're encouraging the troops to debate the lawfulness of each order before they decide to follow it. Surely you know better than that.

214 posted on 09/05/2010 12:19:05 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson