Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maglev vs high-speed rail: Should we change trains?
Building.co.uk ^ | Friday, September 3, 2010 | Thomas Lane

Posted on 09/03/2010 6:05:14 AM PDT by Willie Green

The billions we will spend on HS2 will get us from London to Birmingham 28 minutes faster than the present system does. After Birmingham, the trains will travel on old lines

China has the longest commercial maglev train service in the world. Japan holds the speed record (361mph). Germany has the best technology. And Britain … well, as usual, we’re just the ones who invented the thing. Readers of a certain age may recall Eric Laithwaite’s Christmas lectures to the Royal Institution in which he demonstrated how a linear induction motor (which he invented in the forties) could supply both lift and movement.

Some underfunded attempts were made to turn physics into product, and indeed the UK was the first country to build a maglev service, in 1984. It took the form of a shuttle that connected Birmingham’s airport and railway station, and ran at a speed of … 26mph. No doubt that was comforting for those travelling in a driverless train powered by a novel technology, but it was hardly likely to catch anyone’s imagination, either. It was replaced by a cable car in 1995, and little has happened since.

As we explain on page 38, maglev holds many advantages over conventional trains - indeed, so many that it’s hard to believe it hasn’t emerged as a serious contender for high-speed, long-distance transport before now. A British company called Ultraspeed has been patiently making the case for it for a decade or so, and it has been joined by Transrapid, the German company that built the Shanghai system, architect Ryder, which has produced concept designs for maglev stations, and Faithful + Gould, which has worked out what the bill would be.

The claim is that maglev would cost about half as much as conventional high-speed rail, even though all the infrastructure would be built from scratch; the maximal case is for a system linking London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool and Leeds (with Edinburgh and Glasgow to follow in the fullness of time). This, the proponents say, would cost the same as HS2, the proposed London-to-Birmingham link.

If these figures are robust, we have reached a junction and we should seriously consider the option of maglev. One consideration is that the billions we will spend on HS2 will get us from London to Birmingham 28 minutes faster than the present system does. After Birmingham, the trains will be travelling on old lines, which means we will not be able to have super-long double-decker trains à la TGV: they wouldn’t fit our bridges or our platforms. Indeed, HS2 only makes sense if it is the first step in a strategic rail vision for the whole of the UK. But if we are prepared to spend that much money, we could take advantage of our relative backwardness by leap-frogging other countries and adopting the latest technology without paying the development costs.

But there is another dimension to the choice. Countries are judged on their engineering. Just think how Japan’s Bullet train and France’s TGV network burnished their national brand. The rail network that Britain built in the Victorian era not only created a national market, it established the idea of Britain as the most advanced country in the world, with all the prestige (and the commercial advantages) that came with that. This pioneering spirit lost momentum in the 20th century, and reached its nadir in the eighties, when British Rail developed, then abandoned, the tilting advanced passenger train. The Italians bought the technology, perfected it, then sold it back to us in the form of the Virgin Pendolinos that run on the west coast main line. Now we have the chance to redevelop that pioneering spirit in the form of maglev. But we’ll have to make our minds up sooner rather than later: once we start on HS2, all bets are off.


TOPICS: United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: maglev
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
The Brits really should take a closer look at the Maglev option.

Maglev's elevated guidedway has a smaller "footprint" than steel-wheel on rail technology, and can traverse much steeper grades and curves. This gives it some enormous construction cost advantages compared to HS2, which will requires significant tunneling/trenching for the high-speed right-of-way.

Additionally, Maglev will not only provide Britons with faster operating speeds, but also lower maintenance costs because there are less mechanical components to wear out.

1 posted on 09/03/2010 6:05:19 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Wow. Just think of how much more money we could piss up a rope with Maglev over conventional government rail boondoggles.


2 posted on 09/03/2010 6:08:37 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Gee, maglev is an economic failure in China, so let’s try it in the West! GREAT PLAN!

If it’s so great, Willie, how about starting a company yourself to profit from high speed trains? Just think of the money you could make!


3 posted on 09/03/2010 6:10:55 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
We really can't afford to be giving costly gifts to minority traveling groups when we are so recently bankrupted by the administration. Lets get some debt payed down before we pay for buy some big chunk of pie in the sky.

Willie, are you a paid shill for railroads?

4 posted on 09/03/2010 6:11:26 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

The Brits can do as they wish but I really doubt they’ll be so irresponsible at this point.


5 posted on 09/03/2010 6:13:05 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; mountainlion

9am and already a train thread from Willie. I guess the trains really do run on time.


6 posted on 09/03/2010 6:14:54 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Just think of all the minority union jobs and affirmative-actioned bureaucrats this will create!

Anybody who is against this is a RACIST!!!

7 posted on 09/03/2010 6:15:46 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

That cover the situation so far as I can see.


8 posted on 09/03/2010 6:15:55 AM PDT by benewton (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Sorry Willie, you're still out to lunch with this stuff. The best course of action is to fundamentally change the automobile from a driver controlled device to just a node in a system operated by computers.

Once you work out the "NO ACCIDENTS" standard, the technology for proceeding to full implementation is there.

The aggregate transportation cost savings that can be achieved by eliminating accidents are ENORMOUS and beat the advantage of steel on steel coefficient of friction advantages.

Plus, best of all, once you get to where you're going you can pull it in the driveway yourself. No need to rent a car to get around town.

9 posted on 09/03/2010 6:19:45 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82; cripplecreek; Willie Green
Here it is already:


10 posted on 09/03/2010 6:19:47 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

LOL, that looks like a kiddie ride at our county fair.


11 posted on 09/03/2010 6:24:17 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
All ABOARD!!!

Willie, I ain’t going with this, Just steam power for me.

12 posted on 09/03/2010 6:25:34 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
And Britain … well, as usual, we’re just the ones who invented the thing. Readers of a certain age may recall Eric Laithwaite’s Christmas lectures to the Royal Institution in which he demonstrated how a linear induction motor (which he invented in the forties) could supply both lift and movement.

A flat out lie. The real pioneers in maglev technology were Robert Goddard, an American, who proposed a maglev rail system in 1904, and Emile Bachelet, a Frenchman living in the US, who applied for a patent on a maglev rail system in 1910.

13 posted on 09/03/2010 6:25:38 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (King: "I have a dream"...Sharpton: "I want a check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Concept demonstrated here:


14 posted on 09/03/2010 6:26:03 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
This article is about high-speed passenger rail in Britain,
but your off-topic bigotry against minority travelers in our own country is duly noted.
15 posted on 09/03/2010 6:29:43 AM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer – and some people polka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind; Willie Green
Heck, forget the rails. Just shoot yourself to where you want to go.

http://www.military.com/soldiertech/0,14632,Soldiertech_RailGuns,,00.html

16 posted on 09/03/2010 6:30:25 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Ah, the old “world class city” crap used to pimp the toy train in Houston has been converted to “world class country” crap by the Maglev pimps in the UK.

The UK’s rail system was soundly based (for a while) on a system that made a profit. With greater and greater goobermint control of, course, that slipped into the bottomless socialist pit.

“Look Mommy, I’ve got the fastest choo-choo” is not a rational basis for a transportation system anywhere.


17 posted on 09/03/2010 6:32:56 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Don’t kid yourself Willie, this thread is all about beating up on socialist boondogles, and you. And business is good.


18 posted on 09/03/2010 6:36:24 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Great stuff ~ one of the other travel-time saving advances available with these new technological applications will be the ELIMINATION OF STOP LIGHTS and STOP SIGNS.

Again, the objective here is aggregate travel time and cost for the entirity of society ~ not just the convenience of a handful of rich guys who want to go to "downtown" locations.

19 posted on 09/03/2010 6:38:50 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The best course of action is to fundamentally change the automobile from a driver controlled device to just a node in a system operated by computers.

I could live with that but only if it were on the interstates alone. I still want to do the bulk of my own driving.
20 posted on 09/03/2010 6:43:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson